What's new
By:

Free Alec Burks

TheSilencer1313 said:
Didn't say that either.
I did say Jefferson lead the Jazz to the playoffs without any help from the guard line.
No Chris Paul, no Chauncy Billups, no Mo Williams, no Caron Butler, no shooting at all.....
Click to expand...

Jfferson didnt lead the Jazz no where. They won in spite of him. He played just well enough to not sink us, and barely keep us above five hundred.
 
Hack said:
C'mon man!!

You are just being ridiculous.

You are dogging Griffin because in his one year without Chris Paul, as a rookie, on the Clippers, didn't make the playoffs? But he gets no credit for going to the playoffs in his second year?
Click to expand...

I don't see how I'm being ridiculous.....
The guys always been surrounded by terrific shooting and passing guards, and this opens up his game ten fold.

If Jeremy Evans was the size of Blake Griffin, everyone would be talking him up to be an all-star too.
Oh wait..... no they wouldn't, because he's on the small market Jazz.
 
Hack said:
Jfferson didnt lead the Jazz no where. They won in spite of him. He played just well enough to not sink us, and barely keep us above five hundred.
Click to expand...

Oh please....

Jfferson was the Jazz's only reliable offense last year, besides an often disappearing Millsap, Harris, and Hayward.
 
UGLI baby said:
Where's the empirical evidence?
Click to expand...

I have obtained the highest stamp of approval possible--Cleverbot with an authoritative and reaffirmed no.

silence.jpg
 
TheSilencer1313 said:
I don't see how I'm being ridiculous.....
The guys always been surrounded by terrific shooting and passing guards, and this opens up his game ten fold.

If Jeremy Evans was the size of Blake Griffin, everyone would be talking him up to be an all-star too.
Oh wait..... no they wouldn't, because he's on the small market Jazz.
Click to expand...

Believe it or not there are a lot of really tall guys who can jump high and dunk. Poor argument.

Signed Deandre Jordan, Javale Mcghee, Derrick Favors, etc ........
 
kennykyle said:
Yes I think he should see the court, but its hard when you have a really deep team with good players above him. I can't think of a player I would bench to put Burks over right at this second, probably later in the year but not right now. I am confident Burks will be playing 15+ a game by the all star break.
Click to expand...

I hope
 
Dam, I miss the pace of games that we played last season. We have to wait until Friday for another game??? We get to bitch about Burks not getting enough burn until Friday? I kinda miss having games every-other-day. Oh yea, FREE Burks, Fire Ty!
 
NUMBERICA said:
Well, Tinsley is actually a point guard. For starters.
Click to expand...

So I've heard. Unfortunately, I've seen nothing from his play that would back that up. Maybe on the playground, but certainly not at an NBA level. He's totally washed up.

Foye, on the other hand, actually still plays at an NBA level and has played a lot of point guard during his career.

So the question then becomes, would you rather have a washed up player who used to be an average staying point guard several years ago? Or would you rather have a still pretty good player who can fill in at pg but was never a great pg?

I'll take the one who can at least still play at an NBA level.

Either way, the question shouldn't be between playing Burks or Foye. Tinsley is the one who shouldn't even be in the league, let alone actually getting 20 minutes on the court.
 
nightmare3983 said:
Today's game doesn't matter. Only the future matters.

/talkinglikehalfofjazzfanz
Click to expand...

This is a dumb post.... Of course today matters, but the future matters too and playing burks last night would have been good for today and the future. We still win that game if burks plays a bunch. Dallas is very banged up on a two game back to back road trip.... last night was a win whether burks played or not so he should have gotten minutes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top