Hartsock
Banned
Kenny kyle i tried to rep ya for having a civil, well thought our discussion with me but i have to spread it around first apparently.
Ditto, appreciated.
Kenny kyle i tried to rep ya for having a civil, well thought our discussion with me but i have to spread it around first apparently.
So I've heard. Unfortunately, I've seen nothing from his play that would back that up. Maybe on the playground, but certainly not at an NBA level. He's totally washed up.
Foye, on the other hand, actually still plays at an NBA level and has played a lot of point guard during his career.
So the question then becomes, would you rather have a washed up player who used to be an average staying point guard several years ago? Or would you rather have a still pretty good player who can fill in at pg but was never a great pg?
I'll take the one who can at least still play at an NBA level.
Either way, the question shouldn't be between playing Burks or Foye. Tinsley is the one who shouldn't even be in the league, let alone actually getting 20 minutes on the court.
I have to disagree with Salty's assessment of Tinsley. He is a better PG than Foye, because Foye is not a PG, or at least he doesn't play the position very well, and certainly not as well as Tinsley. Yes, Tinsley has lost a step or two, but he actually is quicker and in better shape than last year, and does know how to run the point.
Play either Foye or Burks at backup pg, play the other at backup sg.
Problem solved.
It won't hurt the team if Corbin keeps the reigns on him. If the kid is playing well, keep him on the floor. If he's making a lot of bad decisions, then pull him and let him know what he's doing wrong.
Case closed, sounds pretty simple.
That's a gret way to destroy a player's confidence, and make them feel like they can't make any mistakes or they will be yanked immediately.
I only saw the two Clipper's games. However, that tandem seemed to struggle to get the ball past teh half court on several possessions. I don't think it's ready for real NBA games.
So would you suggest that a coach should just let guys play no matter how bad they suck?
I think rewarding guys that play well with more minutes is a good idea and that playing guys who suck less minutes is also a good idea.
Also from what i have seen of burks ...
Depends on why they suck, not whether they suck. If they are taking the shots yo uexpect, but the shots have not been falling this night, yo uleave them in. If the player they are defending is taking difficult shots, but the difficult shos are falling, you leave them in. Etc. On the other hand, if they are not playing the game right, you give them a chance to correct it before you pull them.
Shooting hot and cold comes and goes at random. YOu play the people who produce long-term, not who hapens to be hot at a given moment.
Unless it includes some level of insider knowledge, what you have seen isn't enough to decide what Burk's confidence level is like.
Since this type of question has been asked before, I just happen to have the shots/min for all the Jazz players from last season already calculated (expressed as shots/100 min):Oh and you should have done the shots per minute thing for everyone on the jazz, not just the guys you want to use in your example.
I would be willing to bet that Kanter takes more shots per minute.
Actually as far as the confidence thing goes.... I saw enough of him from college, and last season, summer league and pre-season to know he has tons of swagger/confidence.... Its ok if you cant see it cause everyone sees things differently, but i can see with my own eyes that he is very confident