Yeah, you are right about Drogon. I should have mentioned it but I don't think Dothraki will be useless as I thought. Tehy would have showed something. Instead, they were badasses who could stand on a horse, shoot arrows then jump to another horse.
Game Of Thrones
- Thread starter countonbuckets
- Start date
Yeah, you are right about Drogon. I should have mentioned it but I don't think Dothraki will be useless as I thought. Tehy would have showed something. Instead, they were badasses who could stand on a horse, shoot arrows then jump to another horse.
I view the Dothraki as basically Huns. They had massive success against organized armies. Eventually they got taken down but they were extremely successful for a long time.
Nothing alike other than being a cavalry force. Huns and Mongols were much more sophisticated, wore better armor and they were disciplined. They had actual tactics and wanted to build empires. Attila, married a foreigner iirc. Dothrakis are barbarians who just raid and slaughter.
I also remember Martin saying it was based on Huns, Mongols and a few others but I don't see anything other than excellent horsemanship.
MVP
Well-Known Member
Native Americans as well.
Arent the Dothraki known as the best fighters in an open field?
Difference being known to and actually being.
I was probably wrong, I would have liked to see that battle without Drogon.
You get that if the writers say they're good then they're good, right? They didn't actually have a battle.
Sent from my SM-J700P using JazzFanz mobile app
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
You just summed up history.
Where did Martin say they are good?
He provided the outlines. May be Dothraki won't be as effective in the books.
I just thought it would be a fun twist if Dothraki got decimated because they lack better weapons and armors.
Edit: oh, show writers. I didn't get that at first. Yeah, they have a tendency to crowning moment of awesome.