I don't disagree with any of that. I want the Jazz to get #1 pick because I really want Wiggins. But, since the lottery is a game of odds, there is no need to stress out over finishing in last place, let alone rooting for the other team every single game. I think the long term damage to the team from a horrendous season far outweighs any potential benefit the Jazz receive from slightly better lottery odds. I'm surprised I'm one of very few who see it that way. Most seem to believe that the addition of a single potential all star will magically transform a 10-72 team to a championship contender. You better hope a healthy Jazz is much better than we've seen so far, because otherwise, count on being a bottom feeder for at least several more years.
Siromar, bro. Back away from the keyboard.
So you think that a 23-win team will suffer so much less long-term damage than a 20-win team that you're willing to risk dropping from a top-4 guaranteed to top-6? Going from 100% odds of a top-4 to 70% is NOT "slightly better".
Yes, with flawed logic.This has been mentioned several times, and I've already responded to it.
This times 1000. We have committed to a strategy. Now let's do it. I hope Lindsey is a lot more committed to his plan than some of you are. The good thing is that it's pretty obvious that he is.This^
Would be absolutely devastating to tank the year away but still fall out of the top 4.
Some of y'all don't pay attention to tanking teams each year.
Teams do some crazy things in the name of the tank at the end of the season, and I'm not sure the Jazz are willing to get down and dirty like that.
We need to lose as many of these early season games as possible. Remember, we are tanking N00bs and veteran tankers could easily out tank us down the stretch.
If you think starting 0-8 means we can start being careless and adding wins, you aint ready to join the Tank Nation.
So you think that a 23-win team will suffer so much less long-term damage than a 20-win team that you're willing to risk dropping from a top-4 guaranteed to top-6? Going from 100% odds of a top-4 to 70% is NOT "slightly better".
You're strawmanning my argument. If it comes down to a couple of games, then of course it would be better to finish last. But so far, this Jazz team doesn't look like it can beat anyone. I don't have much hope that the return of Burke will make the Jazz a lot better. So rooting for the Jazz to lose every game doesn't make much sense. It'll demolish the players' confidence. It'll decrease the chances the core sticks together. It'll cast doubt on whether the core is worth keeping together to begin with. It'll ruin a culture of competitiveness and hard work that gave the Jazz quite the reputation among NBA teams. In short, the current level of play won't cut it, regardless of where we end up in the lottery.
If it comes down to a couple of games, then of course it would be better to finish last.
You're strawmanning my argument. If it comes down to a couple of games, then of course it would be better to finish last. But so far, this Jazz team doesn't look like it can beat anyone. I don't have much hope that the return of Burke will make the Jazz a lot better. So rooting for the Jazz to lose every game doesn't make much sense. It'll demolish the players' confidence. It'll decrease the chances the core sticks together. It'll cast doubt on whether the core is worth keeping together to begin with. It'll ruin a culture of competitiveness and hard work that gave the Jazz quite the reputation among NBA teams. In short, the current level of play won't cut it, regardless of where we end up in the lottery.