What's new
By:

Gay marriage in Utah put on hold

Stifle Tower said:
No it isn't far-fetched. Already lawsuits have been brought against Christian florists, bakeries and photographers for refusing the business of gay and lesbian couples. Compare this to excluding blacks from dining in certain restaurants if you will, but forcing someone to support a practice they morally oppose - or shutter their doors is wrong.
Click to expand...

I made a cake with 2 boys on it. blahhh
6qwe9y.gif

forgive me jesus
 
One Brow said:
Such a case would be laughed out of court. To this day, no interracial couple has been able to sue to use a religious building, and it won't happen with gay couples, either.

Now, there may be suits regarding land/buildings owned by religious groups, but available for public use. In the law, these are very different things from religious buildings. Your temples will be safe havens for bigotry.
Click to expand...

not exactly the same.
but those f's wiill force their way in
 
One Brow said:
The truth is often distasteful and shameful to those who would prefer it otherwise. Denying gay marriages in temples, churches, cathedrals, etc., is institutionalized bigotry, and having a religious source does not alter that. Bigotry inspired by religious beliefs is still bigotry.
Click to expand...



speaking of truth.

mariage is for procreation!.

thats a cold hard truth buster brown.

another turth is 2 men can not procreate.

TRUTH is in the eye of the beholder
 
DutchJazzer said:
speaking of truth.

mariage is for procreation!.

thats a cold hard truth buster brown.

another turth is 2 men can not procreate.

TRUTH is in the eye of the beholder
Click to expand...

It would be far more accurate to say that sex is for procreation.

Marriage doesn't equal procreation.

I personally consider the argument you're making here to be among the weakest of the weak. There is no procreationablity tests for heterosexual couples who wish to get married. There are many hetro couples who don't want to procreate and there are many who simply can't.

My first job was at a retirement home. A couple of the residents who had been dining together for years decided to get married. So, Dutch, should they have been denied?
 
Gameface said:
It would be far more accurate to say that sex is for procreation.

Marriage doesn't equal procreation.

I personally consider the argument you're making here to be among the weakest of the weak. There is no procreationablity tests for heterosexual couples who wish to get married. There are many hetro couples who don't want to procreate and there are many who simply can't.

My first job was at a retirement home. A couple of the residents who had been dining together for years decided to get married. So, Dutch, should they have been denied?
Click to expand...

soo it is ok to chance defintions?
how about changing the definition of theft. or race?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top