Really, smarten up, for God's sake.
babe is smart. So smart that he thinks he knows a lot more than he does; a common condition among smart people.
Really, smarten up, for God's sake.
Lol, yeah, right.
During the last glacial maximum(LGM), our south shore extended a full 50 miles south of Block Island, which is 12 miles south of those barrier beaches. No doubt you believe that will one day be the case again. No doubt you believe we will return to those LGM days, with a wall of ice 2 m
Nor am I stupid enough to buy into your predictions.No doubt you believe that will one day be the case again. No doubt you believe we will return to those LGM days, with a wall of ice 2 miles high advancing over our entire state. No doubt you are sadly mistaken. And I cannot afford seafront property at all, let alone crippling flood insurance. Nor am I stupid enough to buy into your predictions.
babe is smart. So smart that he thinks he knows a lot more than he does; a common condition among smart people.
But you likely will not see the glaciers at your back door, or the sea receded a mile outy towards Block Island. You would need to be thinking of your descendants three hundred years from now to make that smart investment in lands relicted.
yah gotta just drop the snide. Don't play the idiot.
In case I was not clear, I was including myself as much as you. As for the rest of the post, I'll chalk that up to hurt feelings over the misreading.
I'd enjoy hearing opinions regarding William Happer. Anything anybody might know and care to share.
The histories of this era, just from the point of view of the battle between climate narratives, should one day inspire some interesting courses. "Climate Change Denialism and the American Dark Ages" is running through my head, lol...
William Happer:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...ial-consulted-climate-change-deniers-n1017526
It's often not clear that you consider your points highly questionable, if not patently ridiculous..... considering how far our current experts must be from a "final solution" on questions of the day. I think anyone who actually pays attention could quickly catch the drift that I'm comfortable with my stuff. I might think about it more than anyone else, but I'm not done, yet.....comfortable questioning what I think right along with questioning others.....
We all get caught up in the fun of argumentation. It's my duty to myself, as a skeptic, to remember that all knowledge of the world is provisional.
This would be a serious handicap in your effort to promote an ideological cause or a specific crusade to make the world perfect somehow…..
The "lack of resources" to sustain exploding populations is questionable.
People don't have to believe something to think it serves their interest.
True of Climate Change. True of Overpopulation. True of Socialism.
That’s correct. Climate change is real and concerning. The question is what are we willing to do about it? I think you also have to consider costs when considering risks. Energy transitions are never easy and are unpredictable.