What's new

Governor of Alabama wants to be your brother...by blurring the line

Kicky, it's pretty simple. You brought Utah and Mormons into a conversation that they didn't belong in the first place. What did you expect from your "Utah and it's religious folk have no room to talk" statement? Your statement was based off of very poor reasoning.
 
Kicky, it's pretty simple. You brought Utah and Mormons into a conversation that they didn't belong in the first place. What did you expect from your "Utah and it's religious folk have no room to talk" statement? Your statement was based off of very poor reasoning.

I agree, as I have plenty of room to talk as a life-long atheist (2nd generation atheist) and a person who's family presence in Utah goes back to Brigham Young himself. I don't support actions such as the statement made by the Alabama Gov. and feel like I have every right to say so, regardless of where I live.

As an aside, the way Utah has been is no indication of what Utah will be. The ratio of LDS/non-LDS is getting smaller. The hold that the LDS church has on Utah's political system will carry a lot of momentum, but will not last forever.
 
Kicky, it's pretty simple. You brought Utah and Mormons into a conversation that they didn't belong in the first place. What did you expect from your "Utah and it's religious folk have no room to talk" statement? Your statement was based off of very poor reasoning.

Sometimes I feel like I'm peering through the looking glass.

But seriously, do you want to crudely photoshop something for me?
 
Sometimes I feel like I'm peering through the looking glass.

But seriously, do you want to crudely photoshop something for me?

Way to dodge the point and man up and say you're wrong, guy. Don't worry though, I forgive you. It's just the lawyer with in.

P.S. I don't have to photoshop anything on you. Any picture of you is hilarious/hideous as is.
 
Was that worth a comment? I'm up to 907.

BTW, a poker night with the misses would be cool, even though I was being an *** about it.
 
Thomas Jefferson was writing a letter that had absolutely nothing to do with the first amendment.

Also, Thomas Jefferson was in France at the time the first amendment was made. So this separation of church and state is hardly debatable as the meaning of the first amendment as Thomas was on the other side of the world when it was written.

If the author meant to have separation of church and state, he would have written it so. If he really believed that religion needed to be out of the school system, then he wouldn't have said and believed that he felt the bible should be the principal book used in public schools.

The separation of church and state nonsense was created by activist judges who are basically making up their own constitution.

If people want to have their kids study at a school that is devoid of religion, then by all means go to one. Or begin one. That's what this country is all about.

How much of your worldview is informed by political radio and/or KSL.com message boards? Serious question.
 
Last edited:
I didn't expect this from you.

How much of your worldview is informed by political radio and/or KSL.com message boards? Serious question.

So seriously, you guys haven't figured out that when he writes these things he's being satirical?

It's not exactly the most brilliant satire in the world either. Blunt like a sledgehammer.

I guess this is more proof of Poe's law.
 
Back
Top