What's new
By:

Guess which image Colton removed from the Dallas gamethread

♪alt13 said:
A
article-0-215E409800000578-664_634x793.jpg


Image removed
Click to expand...

Wait so when does showing this much *** an all the *** that [MENTION=249]NAOS[/MENTION] posted an all those graphic dicks in thong underwear not mean infraction? You mods are confusing [MENTION=14]colton[/MENTION]. I asked [MENTION=84]moevillini[/MENTION] this an he said show way less ***. So if I pic a girl with a flat booty or a man butt I will not get infractions? That seems like odd ruling choice. #donotdiscriminateroundbuttockswomen

large.gif
 
jimmy eat jazz said:
Why? What is the obgliation on everyone else to respect as sacred what certain religious sects view as sacred?

Religion, religious belief, religious icons, what religions consider sacred as just as subject to comment, critique, satire, ridicule, mockery,etc. as any thing else. There are, nor should there be, sacred cows; otherwise, freedom is diminshed and the powerful can insultate themselves from public scrutiny, which is never a good thing.

Avoiding giving offense to LDS board partiicpants by making light of what they consider sacred (in this case at least) is done as a matter of courtesy to fellow members of the Jazzfanz community, and is a concession to foster a harmonious community, NOT because we have any obligation, moral or otherwise, to accord the same level of sacredness to those things they do.
Click to expand...

Terrible troll attempt.
 
Three points.

Owners or management of privately-owned internet sites can make up their own rules. Colton is going the extra mile here to be nice.

LDS concerns about Temple-related pics, recording fs, whatever are purposeful to avert the sin of mocking, considered to be an evil that harms those who do it, whether intentionally with knowledge or just uninformed Harmless" behavior. Akin to blasphemy, vulgar speech or actions, and such. Mormons have every right take steps to curb the spread of things deemed evil without using guvmintc force on others. Same as anyone else can take steps intended to personally influence others if they wish.

This site, regardless of LDS persons involved, is pretty steep left tilted. It is because of the specific concerns of participts. It is just rude of a few conservatives who have poor manners on occasion, or who deliberately try to insult others. Fun, sometimes, but rude.
However, may I just say that most proponents of leftist views come off pretty rude,too, quite frequently. Whether they see it,or intend it,or not..

I will take it a dish it out. I don't complain much..
 
bigb said:
Then you simply wouldn't report the post.
It's also highly unlikely anybody else on this site would know you find that offensive. Quite the contrary with this case. It's about 100% absolutely true that alt knew it would be offensive. Besides, according to what colton said, he didn't get an infraction for posting it the first time. But when he chose to be an idiot and pay it the second time (after it was removed the first time), that is when he got the infraction. I would wager the same thing would happen in your scenario of someone posting the image you find offensive.
Click to expand...

No it's not. I didn't think it was offensive. Taboo but not offensive. There's a difference.

I don't think that the image I posted was more taboo than the one in the op. You do which is why you care.
 
♪alt13 said:
No it's not. I didn't think it was offensive. Taboo but not offensive. There's a difference.

I don't think that the image I posted was more taboo than the one in the op. You do which is why you care.
Click to expand...
You thought no one on this site would that offensive? Like no one at all?
 
bigb said:
You thought no one on this site would that offensive? Like no one at all?
Click to expand...

No, I did not think(nor do I) that anybody would think it was a serious insult. A light hearted joke at the expense of the majority yes but no more than that.
 
♪alt13 said:
No it's not. I didn't think it was offensive. Taboo but not offensive. There's a difference.

I don't think that the image I posted was more taboo than the one in the op. You do which is why you care.
Click to expand...
It's clear nobody cares what you think. So probably stop typing. TIA.
 
♪alt13 said:
No, I did not think(nor do I) that anybody would think it was a serious insult. A light hearted joke at the expense of the majority yes but no more than that.
Click to expand...

Unlikely but fine OK. Image was removed and no fract given. Problem solved.

You posted it a second time clearly knowing it offended. Personally I was not offended.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top