Gun control myths and info

[idestroyedthetoilet]

Really? You have to take a driving test to get a license with your picture on it and you have to register your car annually. They don't do that for guns.

I wrote that half tongue-in-cheek, side commentary. But yeah dude, with all the nutters on the roads? There's a reason it's the number one complained about pet peeve.

 

[Getting Traded]

I wrote that half tongue-in-cheek, side commentary. But yeah dude, with all the nutters on the roads? There's a reason it's the number one complained about pet peeve.

I never agreed with you more on anything ever ... Utah drivers are out of control.

 

[Jazzmix]

To me, as european, listening to the guys against guns control is like listening to some jungle people claiming that cannibalism is their tradition and there is no reason they should renounce it. It s a state of mind you just can't reason with. You treat constitution like a Bible, and second amendement like the words of Holy Spirit. I have impression that in that madness of denying the obvious someone will eventually come with the idea to legalise automatic weapons as the best solution against the mass shooting because it's clear good guys lack more firepower to stop the bad ones.

 

[Stoked]

To me, as european, listening to the guys against guns control is like listening to some jungle people claiming that cannibalism is their tradition and there is no reason they should renounce it. It s a state of mind you just can't reason with. You treat constitution like a Bible, and second amendement like the words of Holy Spirit. I have impression that in that madness of denying the obvious someone will eventually come with the idea to legalise automatic weapons as the best solution against the mass shooting because it's clear good guys lack more firepower to stop the bad ones.

Lmfao

 

[Gameface]

To me, as european, listening to the guys against guns control is like listening to some jungle people claiming that cannibalism is their tradition and there is no reason they should renounce it. It s a state of mind you just can't reason with. You treat constitution like a Bible, and second amendement like the words of Holy Spirit. I have impression that in that madness of denying the obvious someone will eventually come with the idea to legalise automatic weapons as the best solution against the mass shooting because it's clear good guys lack more firepower to stop the bad ones.

An automatic weapon would be a completely inferior weapon for a person to use to stop a single threat.

For one, the risk of hitting innocent people would be MUCH greater.

The ability to aim while firing in automatic mode is significantly reduced. So to target accurately while being able to fire quickly a semi-auto handgun or rifle would work far better.

 

[Stoked]

An automatic weapon would be a completely inferior weapon for a person to use to stop a single threat.

For one, the risk of hitting innocent people would be MUCH greater.

The ability to aim while firing in automatic mode is significantly reduced. So to target accurately while being able to fire quickly a semi-auto handgun or rifle would work far better.

Shh! You cannibal.

 

[Jazzmix]

An automatic weapon would be a completely inferior weapon for a person to use to stop a single threat.

For one, the risk of hitting innocent people would be MUCH greater.

The ability to aim while firing in automatic mode is significantly reduced. So to target accurately while being able to fire quickly a semi-auto handgun or rifle would work far better.

Man, I was just being sarcastic, you dont need to explain that to me.

 

[Gameface]

Man, I was just being sarcastic, you dont need to explain that to me.

I was having a little fun there.

 

[fishonjazz]

An automatic weapon would be a completely inferior weapon for a person to use to stop a single threat.

For one, the risk of hitting innocent people would be MUCH greater.

The ability to aim while firing in automatic mode is significantly reduced. So to target accurately while being able to fire quickly a semi-auto handgun or rifle would work far better.

Since when do gun nuts care about facts or common sense.

I would guess that there are plenty of simple folks who simply believe that auto>semiauto so give the good guys autos.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[Gameface]

Since when do gun nuts care about facts or common sense.

I would guess that there are plenty of simple folks who simply believe that auto>semiauto so give the good guys autos.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app

"Gun nuts" know a lot about guns and their characteristics. I mean I'm not talking about mass shooting fetish types, or military special forces wannabes who want to live out some gun fight fantasy.

There are a lot of people in the U.S. who know A LOT about guns. They own guns, they shoot guns, they read about guns, they are HIGHLY skilled with guns. They consider themselves very responsible gun owners.

You can call these people "gun nuts" but they are much more than that. Good or bad, they exist. Their point of view is meaningful and legitimate. To ignore them as we march towards the possibility of "common sense gun legislation" means that no legislation will happen. It's really that simple.

 

[Stoked]

Since when do gun nuts care about facts or common sense.

I would guess that there are plenty of simple folks who simply believe that auto>semiauto so give the good guys autos.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app

Caught yourself in a trap you usually avoid. Generalities.

 

[Jazzmix]

"Gun nuts" know a lot about guns and their characteristics. I mean I'm not talking about mass shooting fetish types, or military special forces wannabes who want to live out some gun fight fantasy.

There are a lot of people in the U.S. who know A LOT about guns. They own guns, they shoot guns, they read about guns, they are HIGHLY skilled with guns. They consider themselves very responsible gun owners.

You can call these people "gun nuts" but they are much more than that. Good or bad, they exist. Their point of view is meaningful and legitimate. To ignore them as we march towards the possibility of "common sense gun legislation" means that no legislation will happen. It's really that simple.

There are also many people who care about wild animals, know a lot about them, keep them at home treating well and responsibly yet I think you will agree not everyone should be allowed to keep a tiger in his backyard. There are laws which discourage people from getting the exotic animals which could be of danger for themself and people around them.