idestroyedthetoilet
Well-Known Member
I'd also like to point out, every team has at least one bad contract, every team (even if it was one a team traded for to get draft picks). I'm not even saying Exum's contract is bad BUT most people are and are also seemingly hiding behind that to rationalize the insistent teasing, bashing or whatever they want to call it. However the fact that it is only 9mil per year is not bad the salary cap is roughly what 110mil (luxary tax about $132 million) and the Jazz' "bad" contract is taking up 9mil of that, I'd say that's relatively good when put into perspective of other teams and how little of the cap it is actually taking.
I also believe with the current roster it is a good risk/reward based decision, he is something the Jazz different then most of the Jazz roster in what he can bring. Yes I get that you have to be healthy to provide it and too get better that is not lost on me and last year was the first season I started to get frustrated and disappointed myself because the type of injuries weren't like the serious yet fluky injuries he suffered before.
So I get wanting to maximize the cap space especially on a team and market like the Jazz as they need to squeeze every drop from the lemon in hopes to be on the same competitiveness as the big market destinations. Even more so that during this time of FA season is the best time to complain about the contract as it could be used to sign another player but again that's what every other team is dealing with as well.
That's almost a passing grade in apologetics. I give it D-. Exum sucks on both sides of the court and shouldn't have been given that contract.