Coach Ellis
Well-Known Member
The big question is if we have to structure the contract the same way the Lakers would have to match it. It sounds like we would.Here’s the argument for maxing Reaves:
The Jazz are positioned to be very cap lean due to their abundance rookie-scale players. There will also likely be a cap spike in a couple of years.
It’s a wild swing but the Jazz are positioned to take it if they wanna get wild.
How much cap space are we willing to devote to him in the ‘26 & ‘27 seasons? I’m assuming that the Lakers would match anything reasonable.
if the cap hits are flat, then I’m all for going after him. I just don’t want the Jazz getting stuck paying out less now and more later. I’m totally down with giving him a good contract IF it’s flat. Especially if we end up having to pay Lauri a Super Max down the road. He makes a couple of All NBA teams, and we’re going to have to pony up when it’s time to extend him.For the non-incumbent team, the cap hits are flat, so in the circumstance above, the cap hits to the Jazz would be $24.5 million every year. However, this wouldn’t be a real max contract and it is hard for me to believe that the CBA would disallow a player access to an actual max contract just because they are an Early Bird.
How an actual max contract would hit for an Early Bird would be ~MLE, ~MLE, ~$60m, ~60m, for the incumbent (Lakers). For the pursuing team it would be a flat ~$37m annually. Assuming that this is a thing, of course.
@HermanG this is the post that I am referring to.