Rondo's effective for Boston because he doesn't have to do anything more than what he does. If he came here with the guys the Jazz have, he'd be Ronnie Price Deluxe.
AND with a ****ty attitude. All for only $50 million.
DO IT. DO IT BEFORE THINKING.
Rondo's effective for Boston because he doesn't have to do anything more than what he does. If he came here with the guys the Jazz have, he'd be Ronnie Price Deluxe.
NO! I'd rather have Millsap than Rondo. He is not the answer at PG for the Jazz.
What is the fascination of Jazz fans with PG's and wings that can not shoot.
Wow. Hyperbole, I hope.
He's a terrible shooter, any way you cut it. Per 82games.com, he had an efg% of .382 on jumpers last season. He also had his worst year from the line, shooting 57% for the season. That's not progress.I'm tired of hearing the myth of Rondo not being able to shoot. That was **** that has stuck with him since he first came into the league, but if you've actually watched his game, his shot has progressed and he's not a bad shooter.
He's a terrible shooter, any way you cut it. Per 82games.com, he had an efg% of .382 on jumpers last season.
I'm tired of hearing the myth of Rondo not being able to shoot. That was **** that has stuck with him since he first came into the league, but if you've actually watched his game, his shot has progressed and he's not a bad shooter. With that being said, he's a pass first guy, good defender, and gritty. Pretty much the heart and soul of the Celtics the past few seasons and he doesn't get the credit he deserves.
Rather than turning this into a neg-rep battle.
efg% on jumpers is much higher than that, even for point guards. .382 is miserable.What's the league average on jumpshots from PGs? I'm guessing it's right around .390
efg% on jumpers is much higher than that, even for point guards. .382 is miserable.
It wasn't a battle, I just didn't agree with your post, especially comparing Rondo with Price. Very poor.
I agree. Price can shoot.