What's new
By:

If the Jazz/Warriors swapped Curry/Burks, which team would be better?

Bawse Dawg said:
GSW wouldn't trade Klay for Hayward in a million years.

I'd settle for a tie. But go outside Utah and see what people would say about those two. Klay has one elite skill Gordon has none.
Click to expand...

Go outside Utah where no one watches Jazz basketball and know Hayawrd as the guy who missed the shot vs. Duke. Yes, real educated opinions against one of the most visible teams in the league.
 
And don't be calling me negative. I'm making threads about how bright the future is.

The only thing I'm being negative about at the moment is keeping all of our players in Utah for the future.
 
Bawse Dawg said:
Dalabro while you're at it you still have to explain how Bogut is better than Gobert and how he dishes out 5-7 assists per night while averaging 2.
Click to expand...

He fits their offense better, never said Bogut was better. Gobert is obvs the superior player.

Just like Hayward is the better player, but how Klay suits em better.
 
Bawse Dawg said:
And don't be calling me negative. I'm making threads about how bright the future is.

The only thing I'm being negative about at the moment is keeping all of our players in Utah for the future.
Click to expand...

You are definitely one of the more negative posters on the board. Someone has to fill that niche though.
 
dalamon said:
because of team fit and chemistry, doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that. They prolly wouldn't even trade Barnes for Melo.

What you should ask yourself is: ask every GM, if building a team, whether they want Hayward or Klay.
Click to expand...

You think it'd be 30-0? I don't. It would probably be pretty dang close.


Let's talk about Bogut.
 
Bawse Dawg said:
And don't be calling me negative. I'm making threads about how bright the future is.

The only thing I'm being negative about at the moment is keeping all of our players in Utah for the future.
Click to expand...

95% of your posts in the Jazz forum are negative
 
King Cy said:
You are definitely one of the more negative posters on the board. Someone has to fill that niche though.
Click to expand...

Only Bawse Dawg would take the awesome fact of us having lots of good young players, and turn it into a sob story about how we aren't going to be able to keep them all.
 
dalamon said:
Only Bawse Dawg would take the awesome fact of us having lots of good young players, and turn it into a sob story about how we aren't going to be able to keep them all.
Click to expand...

Or we jus beat the Wolves, but I'd rather have their team our teams sucks cuz we have no future super=stars.
 
Talking to two guys who say you're negative is you don't think Hayward is better than Butler.

You'll excuse me if I don't take too much away from you guys calling someone negative. By your definition that is someone who isn't sucking off Hayward at every opportunity.
 
Bawse Dawg said:
Talking to two guys who say you're negative is you don't think Hayward is better than Butler.

You'll excuse me if I don't take too much away from you guys calling someone negative. By your definition that is someone who isn't sucking off Hayward at every opportunity.
Click to expand...


Nope. Idgaf if you think Butler is better-- it's just that nearly EVERY ****ING Jazz post of yours is mired with some sort of whining or critique. Whether is ownership, our GM, or our players. And if it's not our players, it's salaries! Dude, every team has that problem. It's life. We won't be good forever. Even golden state is going to run into the same problem once Curry gets his new contract.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top