Inception **^^**
- Thread starter Safetydan
- Start date
Gyp Rosetti
Banned
Harry's lookin' old. They should call him Harold Potter.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Harold Potter along with Hemorrhoid Granger and Ronald Weasley.
I think that goes under reasonable people can disagree. It's pretty hard to argue against PTA's body of work. In any event I think those two are alone in Tier 1 of their generation of directors with a pretty steep drop-off thereafter.
It's like trying to argue Magic vs. Bird.
Rupert Grint actually looks like he might have a decent career as an adult. There's some indications Scorsese's planning on using him in the future.
Who cares about Rupert? I want to see some more Hermione. Naked. (seriously)
prodigy
Well-Known Member
It's a bit premature( MacGruber had a 100% RT rating after like it's first 5 reviews but than dropped considerably afterwards). In that sense RT's method of review fails. RT forces critics to divide their opinions into either "I liked it" (fresh) or "I didn't like it" (rotten). So you can end up with a movie that people kind of like get a higher rating than on a site that gives movies grades.
But it's Chris Nolan, the guy produces great movies. So I don't expect a big dropoff.
But it's Chris Nolan, the guy produces great movies. So I don't expect a big dropoff.
Last edited:
Gyp Rosetti
Banned
Different generations and apples to oranges but how does Spielberg compare to these two in your opinion?
Obviously he doesn't write his own stuff so there's that, but purely as a director, what's your take?
PM me.
PM me.
