Pretty long attention span you have. I cannot watch more than 2.5 minutes of anything D-X produces.
Independent View on Hayward DX video
- Thread starter Qman
- Start date
Pretty long attention span you have. I cannot watch more than 2.5 minutes of anything D-X produces.
Actually what I do for 75% of all DX videos. Let positivity and optimism reign.
Yeah, Hayward needs a better post-up game not only considering his height, but his passing ability. But his moves suck. He'll either take a crappy fade-away or dribble in a circle and get stuck under the basket. He just doesn't have any touch.
This analysis was pretty spot-on.
His lack of explosiveness is a killer.
This analysis was pretty spot-on.
His lack of explosiveness is a killer.
peakbagger1971
Well-Known Member
Do I think Hayward is a max money guy. No. Do I think any NBA player is worth what they get. No. Point is he will be payed what the market dictates. The Jazz need pay somebody. If not Hayward then who?
QuinSnydersHair
Well-Known Member
I think your question was rhetorical but I'll answer anyway. Parsons. Go hard after Parsons.
HighlandHomie
Well-Known Member
Those videos are just clickbait and meaningless. They are fun for basketball nerds like us to watch. Hayward's D being categorized as a weakness is moronic.
He is still adding weight/strength and as he continues in that area a lot of his deficiencies on offense that the video and some on here nitpicked will improve ten-fold. I saw huge strides this past season from the season before from Hayward. He isn't worth the max as a proven superstar/all-star may be, but he's worth the money he will get (10+ per) because his ceiling is pretty special and he's shown flashes already.
He is still adding weight/strength and as he continues in that area a lot of his deficiencies on offense that the video and some on here nitpicked will improve ten-fold. I saw huge strides this past season from the season before from Hayward. He isn't worth the max as a proven superstar/all-star may be, but he's worth the money he will get (10+ per) because his ceiling is pretty special and he's shown flashes already.
Magic Spray
Well-Known Member
Agreed. They didn't reference his chase-down blocks, which are all-NBA, IMO.
However, that the video lists youth as a strength is laughable. Being young may be an advantage, as is experience, but it shouldn't be listed a s a strength along with passing ability; not like he worked on being young. That will change.
Hayward is a fine player, In the right system he would be lethal with his offensive intelligence. However, thanks to Coach Corbin's retarded lobster schemes on both offense and defense, nobody looked good. Except Diante Garret. It should say something that the whole league is interested in him. Face it, if he played for the twolves, we would love him. I hope that the Jazz are able to keep him, and if they are that Coach Snyder's offense uses him well. He's a good kid, most fans would be psyched if he was on their team. Price notwithstanding.
freakazoid
Well-Known Member
Utah can write one year deals if your concern is reaching the floor. They can also take back more salary in trades while acquiring assets in the process. Overpaying on a multi-year deal is a bad idea and bad business in a position like Utah is in now, unless you only care about selling tickets. If you're main purpose is to build a team that has a chance to contend, you don't overpay Hayward during the first stages of a rebuild.
Can we make a front loaded contract for Hayward to fill the cap a little bit more this year? Could CBA experts of the Jazzfanz comment about this? I'd like that kind of deal better if we are really gonna overpay Hayward.
And, does anyone know if a reverse poison pill contract is doable or not? Like a huge first year payment then smaller salaries the next years?
da ThRONe
Active Member
This. The idea that you waste cap space by over paying a player solely because you have cap space is a bad way of doing things. While nobody can predict the future it's a low percentage move to make. The train of thought "If not Hayward then who" is shortsighted as you have no idea who will or won't be available.
bjunior
Well-Known Member
i thought the rebuild was supposed to end this summer when all the bad contracts expire, you have a lot of cap space and dl can build his dream team, especially when this off-season a lot of good players are available, including all-star players
of wait, let's take some more salaries back
Explains the Erin Gordon love
Allowed salary changes are 7.5% annually over the duration of a contract. Doubt Hayward would do this.