What's new
By:

Is Russia Helping Trump?

babe said:
@ Jason and [MENTION=14]colton[/MENTION]. Why don't you ditch that dated autocorrect that has an IQ of -145 and the vocabulary of a nitwit, moron, and imbecile. . . .mathematically the l sat common denominator of the sets.

My IPad mini won't give me enough space to fix those idiotic "corrections".
Click to expand...
Not sure if serious... Jazzfanz doesn't have any autocorrect that I'm aware of. Any autocorrecting that's happening is on your end.
 
fishonjazz said:
I'm saying that the ends doesn't always justify the means.
Click to expand...
Like when the Democratic Party rigs their primaries in order to ensure that Hillary gets the nomination? I agree, especially since it backfired on them so badly that Trump ended up president? I agree. Shame on the Dems and Hillary for their means. I'm glad we got to see what they were up to.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Like when the Democratic Party rigs their primaries in order to ensure that Hillary gets the nomination? I agree, especially since it backfired on them so badly that Trump ended up president? I agree. Shame on the Dems and Hillary for their means. I'm glad we got to see what they were up to.
Click to expand...
I dont like it when this happens.

Yet amazingly, I still don't like it when other countries are involved in our election process.
 
[MENTION=639]Joe Bagadonuts[/MENTION]
Do you think that each election year we should contact the government of a different country and tell them that we want them to investigate our candidates and then trust that government that they don't care who wins and will be totally fair and transparent regarding what they find about each candidate?
 
fishonjazz said:
[MENTION=639]Joe Bagadonuts[/MENTION]
Do you think that each election year we should contact the government of a different country and tell them that we want them to investigate our candidates and then trust that government that they don't care who wins and will be totally fair and transparent regarding what they find about each candidate?
Click to expand...
Trump was making a joke/suggestion that Russia already had Hillary's emails. Do you really believe that Putin watched Trump's speech to Americans and thought, "Great, he just gave me permission to hack so now I'm gunna do it?" Anyone who doesn't know that our enemies are always spying on us is a moron. Anyone who doesn't know that we are spying on our enemies is a moron. The narrative that the wikileaks documents should have somehow been shielded from public view because they may have been uncovered by the Russians is stupid. This entire narrative is being advanced by people who are freaked out that Trump won the election and they are grasping at straws in a desperate attempt to find some way to de-legitimize him. If hacked documents had implicated Trump in some wrongdoing I do not believe for one second that the majority of the people who are complaining about this situation would care.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Trump was making a joke/suggestion that Russia already had Hillary's emails. Do you really believe that Putin watched Trump's speech to Americans and thought, "Great, he just gave me permission to hack so now I'm gunna do it?" Anyone who doesn't know that our enemies are always spying on us is a moron. Anyone who doesn't know that we are spying on our enemies is a moron. The narrative that the wikileaks documents should have somehow been shielded from public view because they may have been uncovered by the Russians is stupid. This entire narrative is being advanced by people who are freaked out that Trump won the election and they are grasping at straws in a desperate attempt to find some way to de-legitimize him. If hacked documents had implicated Trump in some wrongdoing I do not believe for one second that the majority of the people who are complaining about this situation would care.
Click to expand...
You didn't come close to answering my question. Horrible attempt.
 
colton said:
Not sure if serious... Jazzfanz doesn't have any autocorrect that I'm aware of. Any autocorrecting that's happening is on your end.
Click to expand...

That is funny cause jazzfanz can not find some pretty common words all the time that other my programs can. I keep google them cause jazzfanz says incorrect spelling (pinkish red highlight).

I think what you an [MENTION=970]babe[/MENTION] are saying is one in the same. He's system autocorrects but it is cause jazzfanz filter can not spell check.
 
lJ8slvg.jpg
 
I have a tough time believing that the RNC doesn't have equally incriminating emails in their system. We just haven't seen them. Both parties have plenty of corruption and self-interest to the detriment of the American people (see North Carolina legislature for recent example). Yet I still do not want Russia hacking information and releasing what they choose about our election process.

Sent from my HTC6535LVW using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Just curious, who here thinks this is literally the first time a foreign power engaged in any kind of campaign (propaganda, etc.) To influence an American election? Those who believe that do you also believe that Watergate was literally the first time either side had engaged in espionage against each other? Just checking the gullibility of the site.
 
JazzGal said:
I have a tough time believing that the RNC doesn't have equally incriminating emails in their system. We just haven't seen them. Both parties have plenty of corruption and self-interest to the detriment of the American people (see North Carolina legislature for recent example). Yet I still do not want Russia hacking information and releasing what they choose about our election process.

Sent from my HTC6535LVW using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

That's the whole point. The Russians hacked then both but only released the Democrats incriminating info while sitting on the Republican stuff. That is why they figure it was done specifically to get trump elected. I guarantee you are right.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Just curious, who here thinks this is literally the first time a foreign power engaged in any kind of campaign (propaganda, etc.) To influence an American election? Those who believe that do you also believe that Watergate was literally the first time either side had engaged in espionage against each other? Just checking the gullibility of the site.
Click to expand...

I dont think its the first time. I also dont think the frequency of wrong doing means we should't care about it or not try to investigate and prevent it and stop it from happening again.

In every city, state, and country women are being raped and children molested on a daily basis. Women being raped and children being molested are both still things that are concerning to me and things i believe we should be trying to prevent and stop from happening whenever we can.

This comment is not really directed at you btw, more at the poeple who are just like "who cares, everyone is spying on everyone and this stuff happens all the time. No big deal."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top