What's new

It's Over - Ne Deal for Gtime - RFA time

Have to wonder what final numbers were. Bet Jazz offered 11 per and he said "FUUUU! I'm as good as Paul George!"

Lmao
 
Time for Hayward to put up or shut up. In my opinion he's the one taking the risk here, not the Jazz.
 
Yes and lose him in 4 years as well.

If he's a star we'll have him for 8 years minimum cus he'll get a max after rookie deal that he earned not deluded himself into like Hayward.

We will have Favors 8 years total cus we want him And he was reasonable. Hayward was delusional.
 
Dream on. That's the challenge Jazz have, stars in FA do not want to come.

That's the biggest myth in NBA history.

If you were paid 250,000 dollars to work in a war zone, chances are you'd do it.

You give a young star the most money to work in Utah, chances are he'll be cool looking at the snow capped mountains on days off banging some Asian hooker (escort).
 
Some of you are being a little harsh toward Hayward. He isn't being greedy. He's showing some confidence in himself. Probably a smart move considering everyone knows he's going to have the ball all season long.

The Jazz are being smart, too. No point in signing him now unless they knew they were getting a steal. It's kind of refreshing to see them play hard ball in contract negotiations.
 
Favors is an introvert who had chemistry with Hayward.

He will not be as comfortable in Utah without him.

Chemistry, in all workplaces, is what makes success.

I didn't realize that if the Jazz didn't sign Hayward today, they had to release him at the end of the season. Must be one of those new CBA rules. Silly me, I thought the Jazz could just match any offer he received since they'll have plenty of cap space.
 
Some of you are being a little harsh toward Hayward. He isn't being greedy. He's showing some confidence in himself. Probably a smart move considering everyone knows he's going to have the ball all season long.

The Jazz are being smart, too. No point in signing him now unless they knew they were getting a steal. It's kind of refreshing to see them play hard ball in contract negotiations.

It's freak out time. No place for rationality here.
 
Dream on. That's the challenge Jazz have, stars in FA do not want to come.

Yes and lose him in 4 years as well.
Please stop posting before I get vulgar!

Been reading your posts, and are you even a jazz fan?? I am the biggest Haward fan here, but I'm a jazz fan first, and will boo the hell out of him if he leaves the team wether by trade or Free agency.
 
the jazz can match any offer he receives in free agency. if hayward was dead set on a big payday, and earns it by next year - and someone offers the money he was looking for, the jazz can match it. if not, and he gets a lower offer, they can match that and hit the mark they set out for anyway. or if he gets a big offer and he isn't worth it, they can let him walk. Good decision by the jazz.
 
Please stop posting before I get vulgar!

Been reading your posts, and are you even a jazz fan?? I am the biggest Haward fan here, but I'm a jazz fan first, and will boo the hell out of him if he leaves the team wether by trade or Free agency.

I'm pretty sure he openly admitted he's a Hayward fan and follows jazz cus Hayward came here.
 
Please stop posting before I get vulgar!

Been reading your posts, and are you even a jazz fan?? I am the biggest Haward fan here, but I'm a jazz fan first, and will boo the hell out of him if he leaves the team wether by trade or Free agency.

Me too. If the Jazz draft Wiggins or Parker, I say do a sign and trade. If Hayward gets $13M+ he's overpaid. If he has to "settle" for $11M, he's going to be pissed off that the Jazz are underpaying him and pull an AK. Burks has shown he can - maybe even should - be the starter at SG.
 
Top