Trading for a piece that is more likely to make an impact next year in a lost season is just standard roster building 101. That move is still based more on "win in the immediate future" than "build for the distant future". They didn't trade "to tank", they traded so that next year when Steph comes back they got a better team to compete with. Tanking was a byproduct of the Steph injury more than anything.
Acting like it was their masterplan to get to the top is insane, when it was 100% based on a serious injury to their biggest star. Also the impact of that "lost season" to their success can be questioned. Maybe they still draft Draymond and get there even without Barnes and Bogut? Or maybe they trade for Bogut in the offseason anyway?
Acting like it was their masterplan to get to the top is insane, when it was 100% based on a serious injury to their biggest star. Also the impact of that "lost season" to their success can be questioned. Maybe they still draft Draymond and get there even without Barnes and Bogut? Or maybe they trade for Bogut in the offseason anyway?