What's new
By:

Jazz and Bulls are in active trade discussions regarding Zach LaVine

KqWIN said:
As a follow up to this, how do we feel about this kind of trade?

CHI Out: Zach Lavine
CHI In: John Collins

UTA Out: John Collins
UTA In: Harrison Barnes, Kevin Huerter

SAC Out: Harrison Barnes, Kevin Huerter
SAC In: Zach Lavine

This is just the framework of the trade, feel free to add picks if you feel the need to.

CHI needs to drop some immediate salary, this would enable them to keep Pat Williams and Derozan. SAC needs enough outgoing salary to get Lavine. This would likely be Huerter+Barnes, but they could remove one of those guys and make up the different with some spare parts (Lyles, Mitchell, Duarte, Vezenkov). UTA can take immediate salary this year into cap space. Money wise, I think this makes sense for all three franchises.
Click to expand...
Why do we do this?
 
KqWIN said:
Jazz trades have never been foreshadowed.

FWrT47lXoAcIF9l
Click to expand...
This will never get old.
 
jazznik said:
Keyonte needs to become a phenomenal scorer to compensate for his atrocious defense. I have not seen any signs that he can be phenomenal. He has a much clearer path to become a decent scorer with bad defense, i.e. a younger Clarkson. And a younger Clarkson would be a bench player on a playoff team.
Click to expand...
very well said. and so we should package George and Collins to a decent player in return.
 
TJ says not much to this rumor. Downplayed interest.
 
For some reason, I think Hardy might get more out of Lavine+Lauri pair than what Bulls coaches ever could.

That being said, I'm super nervous about this trade if it happens. Rehabilitating Collins value was much easier than doing that with Zach who has a negative rep that you would also need to at least mitigate to make his contract justifiable.

So this is way more committal than the JC trade, and thus MUST pan out if we ever want to build a contender with Lauri et al.
 
HermanG said:
For some reason, I think Hardy might get more out of Lavine+Lauri pair than what Bulls coaches ever could.

That being said, I'm super nervous about this trade if it happens. Rehabilitating Collins value was much easier than doing that with Zach who has a negative rep that you would also need to at least mitigate to make his contract justifiable.

So this is way more committal than the JC trade, and thus MUST pan out if we ever want to build a contender with Lauri et al.
Click to expand...
I actually think the opposite. LaVine'z value is extremely easy to bring back at least in terms of basketball. If LaVine is healthy the Jazz are probably a competitive team for at least the play in. The issue is can he stay healthy. I think if teams were guaranteed 70 games of LaVine and post season availability more teams would be interested
 
My2Cents said:
TheSteinLine:
"League sources say Philadelphia continues to have little interest in LaVine and I have likewise been advised to dismiss Utah's reported interest.”
Click to expand...
Bruh, no need to post this ****. We need to debate things to death that are never going to happen. It's preparation for the coming evolution into AI and GBI.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top