That would be disgusting to deal RJ on a super team friendly deal for 2 picks. Thankfully Ainge will not do that.
I always suspected the Gobert-level deal was what would move Don. 3 Unps, 1 swap, 1 or 2 protected, young player, filler.
The Jazz would absolutely dump RJ For two more picks.
The Lakers might be willing to offer said picks for RJ.
RJ is the top asset the Knicks have that the Jazz are after. They aren’t pursuing him to just deal him right after.
NYK's unprotected picks have more value than RJ. I'll take Jarace Walker or Keynote George on rookie-scale over RJ right now.
They aren’t folding at all. Or else this would have been doneSounds like the Jazz might be folding a bit. Can't get the picks they want so they are now trying to offload long-term salary like Rudy Gay
So Tony, are the sides talking right now or taking a break?They aren’t folding at all. Or else this would have been done
Not as of last night but I think they will start back up at some pointSo Tony, are the sides talking right now or taking a break?
Do the Jazz want RJ to flip him or to build around? Asking because Fisher mentioned it. I'm guessing its to keep him.Not as of last night but I think they will start back up at some point
Asking for my employer — is it gonna be a few weeks? Can I get back to productive work the rest of this week and tune this out?Not as of last night but I think they will start back up at some point
I’d take more unprotected picks from the Knicks over RJ. Hell, they can keep everyone, just give us all the picks and swapsDo the Jazz want RJ to flip him or to build around? Asking because Fisher mentioned it. I'm guessing its to keep him.
I don't get this. We don't exactly need the cap space, and I hardly see Fournier win a bunch of games on his own. Can't we just keep him? He's a solid player, he could even be worth something at some point. He might be negative value for NYK, I don't think he is for us.We might also pawn off Fournier and get 1 instead...
Why the hell do we want him? He only makes us better and we are rebuilding.I don't get this. We don't exactly need the cap space, and I hardly see Fournier win a bunch of games on his own. Can't we just keep him? He's a solid player, he could even be worth something at some point. He might be negative value for NYK, I don't think he is for us.
Are we concerned about our payroll for the next two years? Losing Rudy G#2 would be good, but I don't think the Jazz would put a lot of value into getting off 2 years of $6M at this point.Sounds like the Jazz might be folding a bit. Can't get the picks they want so they are now trying to offload long-term salary like Rudy Gay
It would be if the Lakers just aren't willing to give up both picks. We'd rather have the space than Evan... he is viewed as slightly negative value. We could just keep him of course... but in this scenario he is just the middle ground if they don't want to give up both picks.I don't get this. We don't exactly need the cap space, and I hardly see Fournier win a bunch of games on his own. Can't we just keep him? He's a solid player, he could even be worth something at some point. He might be negative value for NYK, I don't think he is for us.
Yeah no ****... I think Ainge does that in a second. The Knicks want flexibility and want to retain picks.I’d take more unprotected picks from the Knicks over RJ. Hell, they can keep everyone, just give us all the picks and swaps
I don't say we want him, I just say that we're not going to give up anything to get rid of him. The question was if we're taking a lesser offer it if means not getting Evan.Why the hell do we want him? He only makes us better and we are rebuilding.