Told y'all it ain't happening this year
Did I miss something with actual gravity?I am so confused why people think the extension of a guy that NY didn’t want to send and the Jazz didn’t want to receive means the trade is off.
It’s the Leon Rose ultimatum that makes me think the deal is off, at least for a while. I can’t see Ainge responding well.I am so confused why people think the extension of a guy that NY didn’t want to send and the Jazz didn’t want to receive means the trade is off.
I am so confused why people think the extension of a guy that NY didn’t want to send and the Jazz didn’t want to receive means the trade is off.
All I saw was that Barrett signed an extension and that it narrows the possible parameters of a deal.Mostly because of Woj's article.
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id...-new-york-knicks-worth-120-million-agent-says
Because according to Woj reporting the Jazz did want RJ and valued him and NY did want to send him. So with RJ out of the picture who's in the deal now? if no RJ then who's in the deal that the Jazz value enough to come off the ask of 4 unprotected 1st?I am so confused why people think the extension of a guy that NY didn’t want to send and the Jazz didn’t want to receive means the trade is off.
Some key takeaways from Woj article:All I saw was that Barrett signed an extension and that it narrows the possible parameters of a deal.
Jazz aren’t and weren’t getting 4 unprotected. If you look through this thread and even most of the chatter throughout this saga, RJ isn’t in most of those deals.Because according to Woj reporting the Jazz did want RJ and valued him and NY did want to send him. So with RJ out of the picture who's in the deal now? if no RJ then who's in the deal that the Jazz value? enough to come off the unprotected 4 1st?