Anyway, I think the nepotism angle here is a real red herring. Imagine if it was announced that we hired some random guy from a front office who hadn't been a GM yet and all of the sudden he was supposed to be our decision maker. Would we not be asking WTF is going on? But now instead we're arguing whether AA is or isn't qualified for this position. The former situation would be a huge shock having us all wonder what any of this means but now it's swallowed up in the squirrel of "it's Ainge's son." Perhaps he's good. I have no idea. I've always argued that Ainge appears to be operating in a fashion where something falls out of the sky and works for your good, which may happen in Boston but doesn't happen here. I doubt the younger Ainge has that type of experiential bias to believe that, so for all we know this is a good thing. But bigger than this, we just took a team that's the closest we've been to a title in almost 30 years and cashed it in on Ainge-centered plans. If we needed to go in a different (assuming it is different) AA direction, then that time was two years ago. Not now.
But yes, KqWIN has a bit of a point about buddies, at least the way I interpret it. Ryan's connection to Ainge kind of reminds me of The Dude and Walter, where Walter gets him all riled up about a fake kidnapping and then screws everything up, but at the end doesn't have any skin in the game so tells the Dude to not worry about it when it burns to hell.
Spoiler for swears:
I don't know. This seems like we're distracted from the reality of what's happened to this franchise under Ryan's tenure. And all these players have no long-term skin in the game, so they'll all be able to walk away like Walter and tell us not to worry about it.