What's new
By:

Jazz trade up from 30 to 28 and select Tony Bradley

What.. the.. heck, we still could've gotten him with the 30th pick. That 42th pick would've been nice to still have around. But I was right, Tony Bradley was surely Jazz bound which I said before the draft.
 
I don't especially like this move.
a) there were several other players on the board that I liked more
b) I think he would have lasted to 30, and I think the 42 had potential of getting a good player.

But I'll trust DL for now.
 
colton said:
I don't especially like this move.
a) there were several other players on the board that I liked more
b) I think he would have lasted to 30, and I think the 42 had potential of getting a good player.

But I'll trust DL for now.
Click to expand...

Gotta think the spurs wanted him. If that's true, and the Jazz like him enough to move up for him, I'm excited for the pick.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if San Antonio likes Bradley as others in the 2017 thread have suggested - he's super old-school and fundamentally sound. Maybe DL doesn't like anyone potentially there at 42. No clue.
 
kabenac said:
I wouldn't be surprised if San Antonio likes Bradley as others in the 2017 thread have suggested - he's super old-school and fundamentally sound. Maybe DL doesn't like anyone potentially there at 42. No clue.
Click to expand...
More likely they have no interest in 4 rookies on the roster. And the draft and stash has not really ever worked out for the Jazz with the exception of AK and Maybe to a far lesser degree Neto.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top