Being able to bully someone on the court a little bit more than he used to just means he can uses his strength more, and not be the one being pushed around.
He never mentioned his style of play is now like this nasty ***-kicker a la Ron Artest.
He didn't describe himself as a Bully as the article states - nor should D-Will/Delonte/etc. beware of him roughing them up. That's not his game, and he most certainly didn't assert that in those quotes.
“It has been good. I’m more on balance and just stronger,” Hayward said about his offseason workouts, which improved his body composition. “I’m able to kind of just bully some people a little bit more than I was able to.”
How was that taken out of context? I don't have a problem with the article, it seems just fine.
I get that not everybody loves my sense of humor and certainly not every joke I throw out there. Heck, even I wonder what I was thinking after clicking "post" sometimes. I do, however, take exception to Young Blood's assertion that only 20% of my jokes are funny (or at least not cringe-worthy). I'm at least 25% funny.
Since I started writing about sports at the D-News (perhaps before some of you were born), I've taken the approach that stories should be as interesting as they are informative. So, that's my approach. I try to entertain and inform. Sometimes players/coaches/others provide the fun content. Sometimes I try to. And when it's not appropriate, I just stick with the facts and/or story.
It can be a tricky balance.
Jody sucks. Seems like a nice guy, but his jokes suck and he tweets out more of those than anything substantive about the Jazz.
Well, again, I've got no problem with your writing whatsoever - I do think it is top notch and like you said most of the time it is interesting as well as information. I get that anyone can write an informative piece, but to make it interesting as well is not so easy. So again, I do think you're doing a great job there in terms of the articles that you write.
It's really the twitter account that I have a bit of a problem with. And yes I do think it is an important part of what you do, at times Twitter is really your first point contact with the public. I brought up that joke about the Jazz making the playoffs in 2041 - to me that's one of the more cringe-worthy jokes. I really don't mind some 'well considered jokes' (which by the way Bill Simmons does very well - you'll notice how he keep his joke-based tweets to a minimum), but tweeting out a joke just for the sake of tweeting I don't find particularly interesting. To me it's gotten so bad that I sometimes wonder whether a tweet is an actual piece of info or a just joke, and when that line is blurred I don't think that's a good thing for the general public, just for the sake of being 'interesting' or 'funny'.
Like I said you're doing a great job but this is just my 2 cents. This is a Rep comment I got last night, so I don't think I am alone in my view on this:
That's a fair criticism. Guess I was being a bit thin-skinned.
Agree with b_line.
I actually like JG's style. And I enjoyed the article ion Hayward.
He has quite a different persona in the article vs on twitter.