NAOS
Well-Known Member
Let me be clearer: I’m referring to the moment in a debate/conversation when one party alters the direction of things by claiming that another party insulted them.Idiot!
Edit: epithet used without permission.
Let me be clearer: I’m referring to the moment in a debate/conversation when one party alters the direction of things by claiming that another party insulted them.Idiot!
Edit: epithet used without permission.
I take offense to this statement.Let me be clearer: I’m referring to the moment in a debate/conversation when one party alters the direction of things by claiming that another party insulted them.
Um...idiot?Let me be clearer: I’m referring to the moment in a debate/conversation when one party alters the direction of things by claiming that another party insulted them.
I’m still not seeing this supposed gaffe or corner you insist is there. It was a quip. When I said “that would be news to Ben Santer”, I didn’t actually think IPCC author Benjamin Santer is scanning JazzFanz for news about climate science. That line of banter missed its mark. Oh well.Al-O makes a huge gaffe, keeps a straight face, then claims he was offended as he slides out of the conversation.
LolI’m still not seeing this supposed gaffe or corner you insist is there. It was a quip. When I said “that would be news to Ben Santer”, I didn’t actually think IPCC author Benjamin Santer is scanning JazzFanz for news about climate science. That piece of banter missed its mark. Oh well.
As for being offended, I am not. I didn’t take offense because I don’t *TAKE* offense. I have extremely thick skin. When someone slaps me with some label intended to offend, it doesn’t bother me. I simply ignore it and continue on. When someone instructs me to ‘prove to me you know how to read’, it also doesn’t bother me. I simply ignore it and continue on.
I didn’t slide out of the conversation as much as don’t find myself to be that interesting of a topic.
Lol
This guy is JazzyFresh, right?
What Gupta says in that article dodges the important part, which is that CNN lied repeatedly. An outlet that claims to be informing you is actually purveying lies. In the clip Archie Moses posted, Sanjay Gupta admits CNN was lying. He openly admits “we shouldn’t have said that”.So let’s hear from Gupta…
![]()
Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Why Joe Rogan and I sat down and talked -- for more than 3 hours
In today's highly segmented media world, most of the people who watch and listen to me every day on CNN have already received and accepted the message about the utility of vaccines, the importance of masks and how we can all work together to put an end to this pandemic. So I realized that if I...www.cnn.com
I didn't see Rogan exposing anything. The title of the video is a lie.