John Stockton Claims He Had Proof of 1000 Athletes Dying of Vaccine

[SteakNEggs]

Yawn. You'll noticed I haven't called you names. Your arguments just suck, and so you resort to name-calling.

Wrong, and uneducated.

Sure...

 

[SteakNEggs]

I do want to thank OB for admitting that the vaccine doesn't protect you and that even the fully vaccinated can have issues.

Another check mark for those who were worried about the experimental jab.

 

[fishonjazz]

For asking people to provide simple evidence of what they claim? I'll break soon enough as it's clear nobody can answer. As I have continually said, if the guy was fake and didn't even exist then Pfizer would've addressed that when they claimed they weren't mutating viruses while claiming they are "engineering" viruses in the same sentence.

No. I was saying you might need to take a break just because you seem very very upset. Happens to me sometimes when I get to arguing with people on jazzfanz. I was genuinely just trying to give some good advice. I appreciate when people tell me to take a break or chill pill if you will when Im in a long and heated discussion on here.

 

[SteakNEggs]

No. I was saying you might need to take a break just because you seem very very upset. Happens to me sometimes when I get to arguing with people on jazzfanz. I was genuinely just trying to give some good advice. I appreciate when people tell me to take a break or chill pill if you will when Im in a long and heated discussion on here.

I'm not upset though and never was. I appreciate you telling me, and you seem like a cool dude but you were wrong. Nothing I said outside of calling the POS Thriller what he is was out of anger. I may be a little pushy to get an answer but I'm not angry about it. I like having discourse, problem is, only Red and OB are capable thus far.

 

[One Brow]

Sure...

There's nothing wrong with a person regarding being uneducated. Everyone is uneducated in most of the world's knowledge. It's not a personal failing on your part.

I do want to thank OB for admitting that the vaccine doesn't protect you and that even the fully vaccinated can have issues.

That's so far from what I said that I have trouble assuming it is not an outright lie. 95% protection is protection. Your saying since some roofs leak, no one should have a roof over their heads.

Another check mark for those who were worried about the experimental jab.

This reveals your bias. Your looking to check off boxes that support your position, rather than find evidence that supports or undermines your position. You'll only truly be free if you carefully consider that everything you believe is wrong.

 

[SteakNEggs]

There's nothing wrong with a person regarding being uneducated. Everyone is uneducated in most of the world's knowledge. It's not a personal failing on your part.

Lol that's funny. You were trying to insult me while saying you don't call names the post before.

At least you accomplished the goal of turning the subject into grade school bs drama, not the actual topic Mr. Highly educated.

 

[SteakNEggs]

This reveals your bias. Your looking to check off boxes that support your position, rather than find evidence that supports or undermines your position. You'll only truly be free if you carefully consider that everything you believe is wrong.

Lol at one of the higher ups in Pfizer saying their own vaccine can be dangerous ON VIDEO not being evidence. Posting left wing sources that claim the vaccine can affect reproduction like the guys says. Posting a highly respected biologist that you called what a "nut job" with no evidence outside of some **** blog? Posting Pfizers own response where they admit to "engineering"(gain of function). I have provided a lot of outside evidence. I'm not the one claiming a guy doesn't even exist with no evidence and that what a higher up in Pfizer is lying with no evidence... That is you guys. You guys are pushing conspiracies not evidence.

Now...

What evidence have you provided? Be specific please Mr Educated. Outside of simply being a contrarian with nothing to back up your claims?

Btw it's "you're" not "your" educated guy. I'm far from perfect myself and usually couldn't care less about something like this but let's not talk about education when you fail to use grade school education.

 

[One Brow]

Lol that's funny. You were trying to insult me while saying you don't call names the post before.

Again, it's not an insult to be uneducated. For example, I'm quite uneducated about Florida state politics, serving on Naval ship, gun ownership, or competitive swimming pools, and have been taught by others on the board regarding all these topics.

At least you accomplished the goal of turning the subject into grade school bs drama, not the actual topic Mr. Highly educated.

I'm only very lightly educated on vaccines, but I am happy to share.

Lol at one of the higher ups in Pfizer saying their own vaccine can be dangerous ON VIDEO not being evidence.

I understand the difference between "can be" vs. "is". Any legitimate medicine can be dangerous. For example, we still have no idea how acetaminophen works, and we don't have any assurance of it's long-term effects, aside from not having detected any so far. It's the same for mRNA vaccines.

Posting left wing sources that claim the vaccine can affect reproduction like the guys says.

Again, there's a difference between "can" and "has".

Posting a highly respected biologist that you called what a "nut job" with no evidence outside of some **** blog?

You don't claiming to cure cancer with vitamin C is nuts?

Since Ebright is posting out of his field of expertise, he's not an authority on the likelihood of a lab origin for covid.

Posting Pfizers own response where they admit to "engineering"(gain of function).

Engineering is often for loss of function.

I have provided a lot of outside evidence.

You posted the poorly stated, out-of-context suppositions of an inebriated executive, and then misrepresented what he said. That's not evidence.

I'm not the one claiming a guy doesn't even exist with no evidence and that what a higher up in Pfizer is lying with no evidence... That is you guys.

I have not made such a claim. Do you often get people confused?

What evidence have you provided?

What position have I taken that requires evidence, for you?

Outside of simply being a contrarian with nothing to back up your claims?

What claims would you like back-up for?

Btw it's "you're" not "your" educated guy.

Thank you. It's good to reminded of one's fallibility.

 

[SteakNEggs]

You posted the poorly stated, out-of-context suppositions of an inebriated executive, and then misrepresented what he said. That's not evidence.





What position have I taken that requires evidence, for you?

Start here, what did I take out of context exactly? I posted his very own words. What exactly was poorly stated? He was pretty spot on and articulate imo. What part was misrepresented exactly of his own words?

 

[One Brow]

Start here, what did I take out of context exactly? I posted his very own words.

I didn't say *you* took things out of context. You just failed to notice was taken out of context. The Project Veritas video is heavily edited to remove context, and seems to be out of chronological order.

 

[SteakNEggs]

I didn't say *you* took things out of context. You just failed to notice was taken out of context. The Project Veritas video is heavily edited to remove context, and seems to be out of chronological order.

LMFAO that makes absolutely no sense and is your go-to typical non-answer. Now answer the question. What was taken out of context specifically? Don't be like your friends and make up lies and not even have the courage to be specific. It's cowardly. Be yourself. Use words. Back up your claim. That's what educated people do instead of make claims then move the goalposts like you just did. You said I(that's me) "misrepresented what he said". That's pretty damn close to saying I took things out of context lol. I mean, lets not be disingenuous here. Explain yourself. What did I misrepresent(take out of context same difference)?

 

[FalseFlagg K]

Pfizer Responds to Research Claims | Pfizer

New York, N.Y., January 27, 2023 – Allegations have recently been made related to gain of function and directed evolution research at Pfizer and the company would like to set the record straight.

www.pfizer.com

lol interesting that the language has changed when listing the potential side effects. It's no longer "incredibly rare" but "very low" Also all of a sudden it's important to consult with your doctor with everything related to vaccination. Now Pfizer say it's important to discuss if you're pregnant or breastfeeding in assessing vaccination ..??? Such interesting statements now as "These vaccines may not protect everyone" and my personal favourite after listing many recognised side effects they go on to say "These may not be all the possible side effects of these vaccines" All while including no actual numbers.


According to this recent paper analysis shows an estimate of serious adverse reactions at approximately 1 in 800 for mRNA vaccines.

Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults - PubMed

The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These analyses will require public release of participant level datasets.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Farcical.