What's new

[Jones]BREAKING: Jazz willing to engage Celtics in S&T talks: But Gordon Hayward must agree

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 95
  • Start date Start date
I want no part of Olynyk. I don't think he can play next to Gobert. Why would we pay a back-up C that price?
 
And if he's out the door? (I think he's out the door)

Things can change during the season. If he is healthy and filling a big role on a team that ends up better off than expected after losing Hyaward he might warm up to the idea of sticking around, and fans would warm up to him as well.
 
People are suggesting :

Favors+Hayward for Olynyk and Crowder.
I don't think that works for them. That doesn't clear space for Hayward for them. They have already waived Olynyk rights. Favors makes more than Crowder. I could be wrong but I think even in the sign and trade they can't take in more than the salary cap.
 
Then you trade him. But he's always been happy in Utah, and the Jazz never mistreated him, I don't think.

I don't think it was lost on him that we were picking Hayward over him. He hasn't been getting much love at all with his injury-riddled season. I think he may not be super happy to be here at the moment. But things can certainly change.
 
They wouldn't play Olynyk next to Rudy. They'd play Olynyk off the bench as a 3rd big and stretchy 5.
How much are you willing to pay for a 3rd big who only plays backup center behind our best player Gobert. How many minutes will he get at backup? 15?
 
Yeah but then they have to trade Smart or Bradley too.

They probably actually want Favors to give them some interior defense, and its the reason we would be able to get Crowder's awesome contract (short of giving a 1st).
As for Smart, probably send him to NY for a pick or something.
 
Back
Top