What's new

July 14 SL Exum vs Parker 8:30 MT

There are a lot of agendas on this board. There are folks who would rather see the Jazz player they love succeed while screwing over the franchise and prove their opinion right than see themselves proven wrong and have this team succeed. That's ****ing sad.

Fixed.
 
Gobert vs. Giannis was pretty fun for those few minutes when they were challenging each other at the rim. Giannis's length is so incredible he can actually drive the lane and come close to extending over Rudy. Just an amazing physical talent.

Giannis is really impressive. He's very quick and has a nice ability to spin and pivot. Absolutely destroyed Hood on the first play of the game iirc.

And the dunk on Gobert was sick.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];872659 said:
LOLOL. Thriller just negged me. He's on full-tilt after a beautiful game of jazzball.

Lol he negged me too.

There is not agreeing with Hayward's contract, which is understandable.

Then there is being a big baby bitch about it after the fact and using a good day for Jazzfanz as a reason to bring out your big baby bitch personality.
 
Hayward will be a key player for the Jazz moving forward.Dont you get it,the Corbin cloud is gone,all confidence restored.These guys that have had to play under the worst coach to walk a sideline will all show so much more passion for the game. great time to be a Jazzfan.
 
It's because no one has been able to debunk the fact that AK's contract royally ****ed over the jazz during their most likely years to win it all, which were in the beginning years of his max contract. Both he and Hayward were point forwards playing in their contract year for terrible teams and were rewarded for inflated stats. How can you not see that?
Because Hayward's contract has ZERO financial impact in the first two years. It doesn't prevent the Jazz from doing anything. Well, I take that back. WE aren't going to trade for Amare's expiring of $22M. Hayward will opt out after year 3; that's the whole purpose of the clause; so he can get the HUGE bump after his 7th year. At worst, the Jazz get a giant trade exception. Do I HATE his contract? Yes, I do. Do I wish he had given Utah a Curry discount (or even a Favors one). Yes, I do.

AK's contract only screwed over the Jazz in the final three seasons and that was ONLY because Larry H. vetoed a couple of trades (allegedly). Hayward's deal is 4 years (unless he opts out). Jazz can keep everyone on the roster without going over the luxury tax threshold.
 
Hayward will be a key player for the Jazz moving forward.Dont you get it,the Corbin cloud is gone,all confidence restored.These guys that have had to play under the worst coach to walk a sideline will all show so much more passion for the game. great time to be a Jazzfan.

We shall see.

Snyder hasn't coached a single nba game in his life and youd swear pop, Wooden, Red, and Phil all got together and had a love child. Let's see. I do know that shooters like Hood and excellent drivers like Exum and Burks have places in this league.
 
There are a lot of agendas on this board. There are folks who would rather see the Jazz player they hate suck and prove their opinion right than see themselves proven wrong and have this team succeed. That's ****ing sad.
Not i
Down with burks..... go trey..... whatever.

I call it like i see it
 
Brock was cool but he's goofy as ****. Someone start a kickstarter for him in order to get a decent haircut. I'm sure there are more than a few Jazz fans from this board that connect with him on a personal level.

Reported for racism.

exam270314iReportProtestDublin_large.jpg
 
Because Hayward's contract has ZERO financial impact in the first two years. It doesn't prevent the Jazz from doing anything. Well, I take that back. WE aren't going to trade for Amare's expiring of $22M. Hayward will opt out after year 3; that's the whole purpose of the clause; so he can get the HUGE bump after his 7th year. At worst, the Jazz get a giant trade exception. Do I HATE his contract? Yes, I do. Do I wish he had given Utah a Curry discount (or even a Favors one). Yes, I do.

AK's contract only screwed over the Jazz in the final three seasons and that was ONLY because Larry H. vetoed a couple of trades (allegedly). Hayward's deal is 4 years (unless he opts out). Jazz can keep everyone on the roster without going over the luxury tax threshold.

It's not just about keeping key players together.

It's also about making key additions. His contract doesn't help us here. Losing him wouldn't have hurt us. We already have his replacement in Exum, Hood, and Burks. Choose any 1 of these 3.

Plus, it's the principle of the thing.

Personally, I loved Paul Millsap. But id be just as pissed if we had paid him the max. I really would. Love the guy, he's a lot better than Hayward will ever be, and he's a perfect community member. He leaves everything out there on the court just like Malone. But I'd be pissed if we ever paid him the max.

To me, it's a principle. You don't play lazy asses, you respect your mom, and you don't pay soft role players max money.

It's that simple.

I know, I'm a horrible person and a sucky fan for not drinking the Hayward Kool-aid. But I'm a jazz fan. Not an Andrei Hayward fan
 
Back
Top