What's new
By:

Kamala Harris for Pres

fishonjazz said:
For the simpletons: cast doubt is huge goalpost move from attempting to overturn an election.

Cast doubt is way different than calling a state official and telling them to find non existent votes.

Cast doubt is way different than sending fake electors.

Cast doubt is way different than sending a mob to the capital to overrun it and try to stop the certification.

Cast doubt is way different than telling the VP not to certify the election.

Cast doubt is way different than creating a stop the steal fund.

Cast doubt is way different than saying the election was stolen for 5 years everywhere you go and every time you speak.

Cast doubt is way different than filing over 60 court cases with no evidence knowing you have no evidence and you are just wasting everyone's time.

Stupid trolls got me again.

Bye

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
The only point to claiming democrats engaged in election denial is to justify Trump's actions. Think about that. That means that they KNOW what Trump did and why it was wrong. Because if Democrats did a wrong thing, and Trump did at least as much as what the Democrats did then that means Trump also did a wrong thing.

Since Hillary, Obama, Biden, etc., are not running for President then I don't have to worry about what "the Democrats" did because "the Democrats" is not a candidate for President. Trump is and Kamala is. I'll be voting for the one who wasn't involved in election denialism. Which is a relief because I'll also be voting for the one who isn't a convicted felon, isn't a sexual assaulter, isn't a blowhard jackass and an all around ****** person.
 
Sardines said:
The only point to claiming democrats engaged in election denial is to justify Trump's actions. Think about that. That means that they KNOW what Trump did and why it was wrong. Because if Democrats did a wrong thing, and Trump did at least as much as what the Democrats did then that means Trump also did a wrong thing.

Since Hillary, Obama, Biden, etc., are not running for President then I don't have to worry about what "the Democrats" did because "the Democrats" is not a candidate for President. Trump is and Kamala is. I'll be voting for the one who wasn't involved in election denialism. Which is a relief because I'll also be voting for the one who isn't a convicted felon, isn't a sexual assaulter, isn't a blowhard jackass and an all around ****** person.
Click to expand...
I’d normally agree with you but…

What about tax cuts and conservative judges? And doesn’t it feel like eggs are way more expensive? And aren’t Haitians eating pets and raping all of the white womens?
 
Political Jazz Fan said:
Biden and Harris suck so bad.

View attachment 17303
Click to expand...
You continue to prove how much of a falsely informed rube you are.

There has been no withholding of funds to victims of hurricane Helene. None. Didn't happen.

If you think there was withholding of funding you should ask where you got that information, then immediately classify that source as unreliable, then ask yourself why they lied to you in the first place.
 
Both of these guys have gone out of their way to agree with each other before providing the contrasting point.
 
Boring debate overall. Vance probably gets the point because he has done so bad since his VP announcement yet was presentable in this debate. There were a few times I felt Walz was a bit deer in the headlights. Not overall, but a few moments of that.
 
This is some pretty ****ed up framing by our “liberal media.” Seems like mass deportation shouldn’t be considered a realistic solution to a housing shortage. But I guess I’m just a softie that thinks problems have humane solutions

IMG_9102.jpeg
 
Debate prep is more than coming up with and stashing away some lines. Whoever prepped Walz should be fired. Tonight.

Hammering people over their dodges and damning distortions of reality is not just fair, it is absolutely necessary and Walz just let Vance gaslight the whole world about January 6th. Last topic of the night, too. What in the ****.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Debate prep is more than coming up with and stashing away some lines. Whoever prepped Walz should be fired. Tonight.

Hammering people over their dodges and damning distortions of reality is not just fair, it is absolutely necessary and Walz just let Vance gaslight the whole world about January 6th. Last topic of the night, too. What in the ****.
Click to expand...
I agree he didn't even push that a little bit. That should have been a "Hold up! We're not going anywhere until we get this straight." type of situation. Instead it was a "Well I have strong feeling to the contrary." situation.
 
I don't think anyone should be too surprised that Walz was wishy-washy. He has that small town charm but also doesn't really seem like the bulldog we hoped he was. The Harris-Walz ticket it just weak, and we already knew that. No one's first choice, except Biden I guess, was Harris in the first place. Adding Walz was a good move, but he's a nice guy at heart, tough to get him to be aggressively confrontational against his nature. We can only hope the milquetoast ticket is enough to overcome the evil ticket. But I'm afraid they may have lost voters in this one.
 
LogGrad98 said:
I don't think anyone should be too surprised that Walz was wishy-washy. He has that small town charm but also doesn't really seem like the bulldog we hoped he was. The Harris-Walz ticket it just weak, and we already knew that. No one's first choice, except Biden I guess, was Harris in the first place. Adding Walz was a good move, but he's a nice guy at heart, tough to get him to be aggressively confrontational against his nature. We can only hope the milquetoast ticket is enough to overcome the evil ticket. But I'm afraid they may have lost voters in this one.
Click to expand...
I prefer peanut butter on my toast. Milk just makes it soggy.
 
Elizah Huge said:
Trump could take some PR lessons from Vance. Sad that the VP nominee looks more presidential than a former president running for a second term.
Click to expand...

Vance is already on the record speaking out strongly against The Rapist. In my opinion he is doing whatever it takes to get ahead politically even if it means being someone he's not. If they win and The Rapist choked to death on a cheeseburger Vance would be a reasonable replacement in comparison.
 
Funny how we seem to face the choice of most bland and likely impotent presidency in recent history vs likely the most evil presidency in the history of the country. Crazy extremes.
 
str8line said:
Vance is already on the record speaking out strongly against The Rapist. In my opinion he is doing whatever it takes to get ahead politically even if it means being someone he's not. If they win and The Rapist choked to death on a cheeseburger Vance would be a reasonable replacement in comparison.
Click to expand...
How could we possibly get cheeseburgers into position to carry out this vital mission?

...

Rosner-Fast-Food-Trump.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top