TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
Will probably slow down I imagine, but still interesting to think about.
Loving their continuity on the lobs to Rudy, adds a huge element to our offense and forces the d to stick with Rudy and gives us those easy one legged layups.
Helps Rudy's defensive intensity too knowing that he's involved offensively. Rudy is all about the team but it's hard sprinting up and down the court knowing you're not getting looks.I think part of it is how they're hitting him to. I remember an issue last year was getting the ball to Rudy where he could be be effective. I'm seeing more passes to the upper part of his torso as well as the lobs. It makes him much more effective because he can quickly get it to the basket. Small change, but extremely effective.
I agree to a point. But Rudy's competitiveness, focus on the team, and personal drive transcends all of that. Yeah the opportunity to finish at the rim from unselfish team-mates probably puts a little giddy-up in his stride, but he would sprint just the same if he were averaging 8 points per game. That is just who he is. One of the fiercest competitors I have seen in the NBA, let alone in a Jazz uni.Helps Rudy's defensive intensity too knowing that he's involved offensively. Rudy is all about the team but it's hard sprinting up and down the court knowing you're not getting looks.
With that repetition has come improvement from the Jazz’s ballhandlers who have a better idea where Golbert and Favors like the pass thrown.
Man I expect better from our own media. Sure everyone else will mess up his name, but damn man.
Just a typo -- note on the keyboard, l is right under O, so it's possible both were typed together resulting in ol instead of just o.Man I expect better from our own media. Sure everyone else will mess up his name, but damn man.
Editing is a lost art apparently.Just a typo -- note on the keyboard, l is right under O, so it's possible both were typed together resulting in ol instead of just o.
It was online, right? So they apparently didn't edit. Even in books today, there is less editing. You're right, it is a lost art. And it's hard to find good ones. Some who do try to edit, overdo it. I know from experience, having had editors f up some of my articles. There are some good ones left, though, and they are ones who don't edit heavily but precisely in just the right places.Editing is a lost art apparently.