What's new
By:

Last 7 games +/- for the BIG MEN

D

DutchJazzer

Banned
Enes kanter
Has been +60 in 183 minutes(+0,327 per minute)
Favors
has been
-44 in 178 minutes(-0.24 per minute)
Millsap
-23 in 115 minutes (-0.2 per minute)

Al jeffersuck the great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-117 in 110 minutes for a WHOPPPING (-1.063 per minute)

in addition to that jefferson his "crappy" backup has been avg: 15 points and 8.9 rebounds in six games while shooting 66 percent from the floor 88% from the free throw line going to the line in 2.6 times per game . in just 26 miutes per game.

if kanter was treated like big al kanter would avg 25-12.



HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH.


just having withdrawal symptoms from not being able to make the game thread.
1020635.jpg
 
Last edited:
Its sad that he gets so many minutes. You read anything about the Jazz that isn't local media and its clear to everyone but Corbin that Jefferson makes his teammates worse by his stagnant offense and absolutely terrible defense. Scoring 18PPG is nice but giving up as much as he does on defense is turrible
 
DutchJazzer said:
Enes kanter
Has been +60 in 183 minutes(+0,327 per minute)
Favors
has been
-44 in 178 minutes(-0.24 per minute)
Millsap
-23 in 115 minutes (-0.2 per minute)

Al jeffersuck the great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-117 in 110 minutes for a WHOPPPING (-1.063 per minute)

in addition to that jefferson his "crappy" backup has been avg: 15 points and 8.9 rebounds in six games while shooting 66 percent from the floor 88% from the free throw line going to the line in 2.6 times per game . in just 26 miutes per game.

if kanter was treated like big al kanter would avg 25-12.



HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH.


just having withdrawal symptoms from not being able to make the game thread.
1020635.jpg
Click to expand...

Ouch.
 
To be fair, Jefferson didn't play v. Charlotte, and Millsap didn't play v. NY (or Charlotte).

Enes has been playing well, of course, but he's gotten a lot of minutes in garbage time (v. NY, OKC) and against the Bobcats (44 minutes).
 
GVC said:
To be fair, Jefferson didn't play v. Charlotte, and Millsap didn't play v. OKC (or Charlotte).

Enes has been playing well, of course, but he's gotten a lot of minutes in garbage time (v. NY, OKC) and against the Bobcats (44 minutes).
Click to expand...

True but that is still no excuse for a -144. Outrageous. Kanters numbers are inflated by that to some degree. These numbers just reinforce what we already knew. That our starting 5 get abused.
 
Kanter is going to be a beast in 4 to 5 years. He will be 3/4's Boozer and 1/4th Dirk. Better than Boozer of course, but a similar game.
 
DutchJazzer said:
Enes kanter
Has been +60 in 183 minutes(+0,327 per minute)
Favors
has been
-44 in 178 minutes(-0.24 per minute)
Millsap
-23 in 115 minutes (-0.2 per minute)

Al jeffersuck the great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-117 in 110 minutes for a WHOPPPING (-1.063 per minute)

in addition to that jefferson his "crappy" backup has been avg: 15 points and 8.9 rebounds in six games while shooting 66 percent from the floor 88% from the free throw line going to the line in 2.6 times per game . in just 26 miutes per game.

if kanter was treated like big al kanter would avg 25-12.



HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH.


just having withdrawal symptoms from not being able to make the game thread.
1020635.jpg
Click to expand...

The best part?
Favors and Milsap share more minutes with Al than Kanter does. If Favors and Milsap's +/- excluded Al's minutes, then they'd be pluses for sure.
 
Al would be more efficient with a better outside shooter backcourt lightening the weigh on his shoulders. How many airballs did the Jazz threw in the OKC game one after another?
 
addictionary said:
Al would be more efficient with a better outside shooter backcourt lightening the weigh on his shoulders. How many airballs did the Jazz threw in the OKC game one after another?
Click to expand...

That argument holds no weight. Three point percentages are as follows. They just aren't getting the looks because Al can't get deep post position and draw enough doubles.

Mo: 38.9%
Foye: 40.2%
Hayward: 39.7%
Burks: 35.8%
Marvin: 34.3%
 
Jazz4ever said:
That argument holds no weight. Three point percentages are as follows. They just aren't getting the looks because Al can't get deep post position and draw enough doubles.

Mo: 38.9%
Foye: 40.2%
Hayward: 39.7%
Burks: 35.8%
Marvin: 34.3%
Click to expand...

This is what is so sad about this team. We have very good outside shooters. We have very good defenders. We have very good slashers. We have top 10 picks.

Yet, we build around Al, who wrecks everything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top