What's new

Lauri Markkanen Hype & Appreciation Thread

There is ongoing discussion in Finland on what are criterions, and how to determine the Sportman of the year 2022.

Lauri is eligible, but Finnish audience just follow those eternal skiers. It never downed onto Finnish citizens that there may something bigger than that skiiing...
Not sure if trolling or what, but Markkanen won't end up voted in Top4, probably not even in Top6. Rovanperä, Niskanen, Murto and Raitanen are all ahead of Markkanen in the vote (and only one of them is a cross-country skier). In the vote Markkanen is competing with the other team-sportsmen Barkov and Pukki for the positions 5-7. While leading the Finnish national team through a historic World Cup qualifiers, and also playing extremely well in EuroBasket, Markkanen actually won absolutely nothing in 2022, and the award by definition goes to the one who *won* something outstanding while also performing in an outstanding fashion for the whole year.

Markkanen, Barkov and Pukki sure are great sportsmen all, but to win the title of Sportsman of the Year you actually have to win something BIG, like the world-championship or Olympic gold. Back in his days Litmanen didn't win any such, but he did to win Champions league and also persoanally won the golden boot in Champions league (the player with most scored goals) before he was voted Sportsman of the year in 1995, and even that many considered to be more because the year was quite weak as there weren't any *real* sports-events that year.
 
Also, if Ainge had any inkling that Markennan was anywhere close to this special then he probably should not have gutted the roster. Probably should have kept bogey and Gobert or Donovan or at least traded one of those two for win now pieces. We could be a contender this very year if Ainge knew how good Markennan could be and would have made other moves accordingly.
Jazz didn't need to gut the roster. They have played the cards nearly perfectly this far
 
Markkanen made 83 out of his last 165 threes in the previous 22 games before that. That is 50.3% on 7.5 attempts per game.

To call him out after a few bad shooting games which weren’t even that bad to begin with is ****ing weak especially in this thread. Be better.
Just an observation. I'm well aware that Lauri had a career best hot streak before this (and a legit slump before that, to start the season). But now the pendulum has swung again.

It always does, and usually everything evens out. (And his 2pt shooting has nothing to do with this, obviously. That remains solid.)

Shooting slumps interest me because they're like slight mental malfunctions. Bugs in the code. IMO, they're a mild form of the yips. And some players are definitely more susceptible to them than others.

Most guys who've always relied on their long balls tend to want to "shoot their way out" of these slumps. It's almost superstition. We've already seen that this season with Beasley, who just keeps desperately launching bombs, no matter how badly they keep clanking. Lauri's pretty much doing the same now, and I always wonder about this approach. There are other options: when Olynyk stopped hitting from the perimeter a while ago, he turned timid and started passing off open shots. He was scared. Obviously, that's not good either. But then again, KO is not really a shooter anyway. He doesn't have that irrational confidence. He reacts differently.

I know veteran players don't like their routines disturbed too much or their touches/shots ****ed around with, but wouldn't it make sense for coaches to recognize when a player is slumping from the perimeter and to temporarily adjust their role (if possible)? Do we need a volume guy to be missing 80% of his 3pt shots game after game? I get the "it's still spacing the floor" argument, but the long rebound off a missed 3pt shot often jump starts a fast break by the other team, and you can't just stop fast breaks by fouling anymore. Bricks shouldn't be taken lightly.

I guess what l'm saying is, I'd like to see Lauri play a lot of center for a while on offense. Use him as the screener in high pick and rolls, let him dive to the hoop or do a short roll to the FT line. You could even mix it up by putting him at the dunker's spot when KO is playing the screener role.

Just don't park him on the weak side perimeter or in the corner, staring down those spot up 3's that are not dropping.

(Disclaimer: if you're a tanker, just ignore everything I just said and be happy Lauri is missing)
 
Last edited:
This is the Finn-mentality rising on the forum. An old Finnish saying: a pessimist is never disappointed. The negativity is something I as a Finn very much do not like.
The person making the ridiculous argument about Lauri shooting 30% from deep over a few games is a Finn?
 
Jazz didn't need to gut the roster. They have played the cards nearly perfectly this far

I agree that they didnt need to. And if they knew Markennan was this good they probably wouldnt have. They didnt know he was this good though.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Wait, are you aware what the league average 3pt percentage is?

30% is terrible for a volume shooter. Not saying Lauri should stop shooting and it's good he's been able to score in other ways... but it is what it is. Just stating facts.
Why bother stating such “facts”? Every 3-point shooter has periods when 3s go in and then when they don’t. Just the way the cookie crumbles. And that’s why we have averages. When his 3s aren’t going in for Lauri, he uses other tools from his big toolbox. It’s different with Beasley, whose toolbox is small.
 
Just an observation. I'm well aware that Lauri had a career best hot streak before this (and a legit slump before that, to start the season). But now the pendulum has swung again.

It always does, and usually everything evens out. (And his 2pt shooting has nothing to do with this, obviously. That remains solid.)

Shooting slumps interest me because they're like slight mental malfunctions. Bugs in the code. IMO, they're a mild form of the yips. And some players are definitely more susceptible to them than others.

Most guys who've always relied on their long balls tend to want to "shoot their way out" of these slumps. It's almost superstition. We've already seen that this season with Beasley, who just keeps desperately launching bombs, no matter how badly they keep clanking. Lauri's pretty much doing the same now, and I always wonder about this approach. There are other options: when Olynyk stopped hitting from the perimeter a while ago, he turned timid and started passing off open shots. He was scared. Obviously, that's not good either. But then again, KO is not really a shooter anyway. He doesn't have that irrational confidence. He reacts differently.

I know veteran players don't like their routines disturbed too much or their touches/shots ****ed around with, but wouldn't it make sense for coaches to recognize when a player is slumping from the perimeter and to temporarily adjust their role (if possible)? Do we need a volume guy to be missing 80% of his 3pt shots game after game? I get the "it's still spacing the floor" argument, but the long rebound off a missed 3pt shot often jump starts a fast break by the other team, and you can't just stop fast breaks by fouling anymore. Bricks shouldn't be taken lightly.

I guess what l'm saying is, I'd like to see Lauri play a lot of center for a while on offense. Use him as the screener in high pick and rolls, let him dive to the hoop or do a short roll to the FT line. You could even mix it up by putting him at the dunker's spot when KO is playing the screener role.

Just don't park him on the weak side perimeter or in the corner, staring down those spot up 3's that are not dropping.

(Disclaimer: if you're a tanker, just ignore everything I just said and be happy Lauri is missing)
Yeah those 3-point shooters. It is hard to put a finger on it. Whatever it is, they’ve gotten better and better at it over the years.
 
Any Finns here who could potentially buy me a Finland Lauri jersey from Finland and ship it to me? I’ll compensate you for your time.
 
Why bother stating such “facts”? Every 3-point shooter has periods when 3s go in and then when they don’t. Just the way the cookie crumbles. And that’s why we have averages. When his 3s aren’t going in for Lauri, he uses other tools from his big toolbox. It’s different with Beasley, whose toolbox is small.
It's all in my post. Read it or don't, I don't give a ****.
 
Back
Top