NAOS
Well-Known Member
Yeah, he should be the 3-time defending DPOY right now, headed for his fourth straight.Think he's probably the best ive ever seen, maybe Mutombo, close tho.
Yeah, he should be the 3-time defending DPOY right now, headed for his fourth straight.Think he's probably the best ive ever seen, maybe Mutombo, close tho.
Lots of hype on Anthony Davis. Votes may be more thoughtless this year.Yeah, he should be the 3-time defending DPOY right now, headed for his fourth straight.
This is recency bias and not at all accurate. Harden is an anomaly in his own right but generally players are not scoring any more than in previous years. Go look at the averages from the 80's where multiple players would score 30+ for the season. We haven't had that in a while.Players score more points on average nowadays than in the past because of the new rules and all.
Mike Conley was supposed to be our other reliable scoring option outside of Mitchell. Still nice to have two scorers on the team though.
Data is insufficient to support your analysis. Good analysis would be to compare the number of players per team averaging 20+ in the league per year.This is recency bias and not at all accurate. Harden is an anomaly in his own right but generally players are not scoring any more than in previous years. Go look at the averages from the 80's where multiple players would score 30+ for the season. We haven't had that in a while.
Anecdotally, in the '80s, ticket holders got free fries(?) if the Jazz held their opponent to less than 100 points.Data is insufficient to support your analysis. Good analysis would be to compare the number of players per team averaging 20+ in the league per year.
This is recency bias and not at all accurate. Harden is an anomaly in his own right but generally players are not scoring any more than in previous years. Go look at the averages from the 80's where multiple players would score 30+ for the season. We haven't had that in a while.
Data is insufficient to support your analysis. Good analysis would be to compare the number of players per team averaging 20+ in the league per year.
You do that. Let us know how it goes.Data is insufficient to support your analysis. Good analysis would be to compare the number of players per team averaging 20+ in the league per year.
LogGrad, the point is, players ARE scoring more than they used to. Your Harden reference demonstrates nothing. Your recency bias argument is badly flawed. It appears that there were two brief periods when scoring was unusually high , the mid 80s and now, assuming that your facts are correct. You can't use a 5 year period and say that is the norm, and reject a 25 year period as not relevant due to "recency bias."This is recency bias and not at all accurate. Harden is an anomaly in his own right but generally players are not scoring any more than in previous years. Go look at the averages from the 80's where multiple players would score 30+ for the season. We haven't had that in a while.