InGameStrategy
Well-Known Member
Fixed.So what are teams like Phoenix (who lost Amare for nothing), Denver (who lost Carmello Anthony), Toronto (who got nothing in return for Chris Bosh), and Cleveland (who got nothing for Lebron and instead got dissed on national television) supposed to do? How are those teams supposed to compete, and how are they supposed to fill their seats when fans want to see a winning product? I think that as much as smaller market teams want a strong share of BRI, those teams are just as motivated to try to gain some semblance of control over the market for free agents. Why? Because they keep getting screwed by players who want to rule the world. I think this is the gist of the conflict and why the superstars, executive "committee", lawyers, and agents shot down the proposal without letting the rank-and-file players vote.
Further credence to the notion that the journeymen aren't involved in the process.
BTW, cool essay, bro (from one who has a tendency to write them
The number of non-big-market teams who lost big players is a good point that you mentioned. Phoenix is a relatively big city, but they still had a hard time holding on to Amare, and Denver is a somewhat fun and hip city, too, but not good enough for the Syracuse punk. More understandable that so many owners were pushing for more parity.