What's new

Looking for genuine discourse re: Donald Sterling/NBA

And yet there are teachers that are pissed off because they have to work for and with incompetents. My kids go to a charter school, no teachers union, no fancy tenure issues, bad teachers wash out, good ones are happy, and the school is very high performing. Enrollment just maxed out, so instead of instituting a lottery, they are just going to build two more just like it, one of them in the poorest section of town. Arizona lets us earmark a portion of our own state tax bill to help out with stuff like this. They have to wear uniforms, discipline is very strict and in most cases taken off the plate of teachers, which is a benefit to them. There are no buses so parents have to commit to getting their kids to school and one to two hours of homework a night is required.
And the best part is they do this without the by-your-leave of people who want to put a myriad of restrictions on what choice you can make. See the stupid thing about lotteries is that you are consigning the kids that lose to a crap education and possibly a poor outcome in life. The answer is to put the power of choice into the hands of the parents, even if that means crowding out public schools and teachers unions. Reward financially schools that get it right and give them the incentive to expand. And yes this will involve some people giving up the control that they have become accustomed to .

We're moving my daughter to a charter school this fall. Tried to get in last year, but didn't get a spot via the lottery. Like your situation, this school has proven so popular they are opening up another campus. I'm not sure what can be done outside of a lottery when demand outstrips supply. In our case, the lottery "losers" were added to the waiting list and that has been resolved by adding a new location. Charter schools are a great option, but they're VERY hard to start up as a school district has to sponsor them (and keep renewing their charter). And therein lies the problem: what school district wants a competitor in their midst that siphons state and federal funds away from them?

Personally, I like the idea of uniforms. Kids can be cruel to others if they don't have the popular labels on their clothes. I definitely love taking power away from the teachers unions. In CA they exist solely for the purpose of keeping incompetent and sometimes criminal teachers in their jobs. It's damn near impossible to get a teacher fired in the LAUSD. Even if a teacher is clearly incompetent, negligible, etc., it takes YEARS before any action can be brought against them. In the meantime, they're getting full salary and benefits while they vacation away and let the union keep them employed.

In our case, the school my daughter attends is actually one of the better ones. But for a variety of reasons, we're making the leap. One is to get her into the charter Jr. High when it's time. The one she'd feed in to is has some serious problems. And two is the common core nonsense. It's a topic for another thread, but you cannot BELIEVE what crap my daughter is being forced to listen to and agree with. It's not only a "one method fits all" system, it's indoctrination that would inspire Orwell to pen another novel. There will still be a common core element in the charter school, but nothing like what she is getting now.
 
I'm confused on why celebrating the resignation of D'Antoni reveals a really dark and morally reprehensible side of his character. Could you explain that further, please?

He basically spit on D'Antoni publicly on Twitter (has over 2,000,000 followers) mere minutes after the news of D'Antoni's 'resignation' was reported. He was effectively fired. Even if you say D'Antoni chose to quit - it's still a situation another working-aged human can relate to. Whether Magic's differences with D'Antoni stem from something behind closed doors (never to be made public) or because the Lakers had poor showings during his brief tenure, the timing and content of his message not only lacked tact and grace but was a true sign of Magic's ugly vindictiveness inside of him. It is utterly insensitive, and petty.

Minutes after D'Antoni was reported to be unemployed, Magic said, "Happy days are here again! Mike D'Antoni resigns as the Lakers coach. I couldn't be happier!"

He infers his days were unhappy while D'Antoni was coach, and the fact D'Antoni is no longer is the coach delivered him to bliss. Obviously, I don't truly believe D'Antoni's status with the Lakers truly impacted Magic in that way - but the act of embellishment by Magic is driven by hate.

That reveals a deep-rooted hatred inside him for another person based on what I'm assuming is something petty. I'd imagine we'd have heard about any racial/criminal dust-up between the two, which could cause someone to possess that type of contempt for another human to use a platform where you reach millions of people to celebrate their loss of a job.

I get worked up with the latest news being a major story because the public is focused on the surface issue (Sterling), which for all intensive purposes is totally meaningless in the big picture.

If one owner of an NBA team mistreats an employee because of their race, another mistreats their employee because of their religion, another mistreats their employee because of their sexuality and another mistreats their employee because they've grown to disagree about how they coach a game of basketball - what's the ****ing difference? Sterling actually wasn't caught "mistreating" any of his employees (again, I must reiterate I am not defending him nor think he shouldn't have been removed).

The essence of my feelings are that a hateful person shouldn't be allowed to be in a position of power (in any arena of life). What type of form that hate comes in (bigotry, vindictiveness, spite, etc.) is irrelevant.

It seems hypocritical to condemn one person, but celebrate another who is equally hateful yet not in the simple form of racism.

I hope that helps clear some of that up.
 
He basically spit on D'Antoni publicly on Twitter (has over 2,000,000 followers) mere minutes after the news of D'Antoni's 'resignation' was reported. He was effectively fired. Even if you say D'Antoni chose to quit - it's still a situation another working-aged human can relate to. Whether Magic's differences with D'Antoni stem from something behind closed doors (never to be made public) or because the Lakers had poor showings during his brief tenure, the timing and content of his message not only lacked tact and grace but was a true sign of Magic's ugly vindictiveness inside of him. It is utterly insensitive, and petty.

Minutes after D'Antoni was reported to be unemployed, Magic said, "Happy days are here again! Mike D'Antoni resigns as the Lakers coach. I couldn't be happier!"

He infers his days were unhappy while D'Antoni was coach, and the fact D'Antoni is no longer is the coach delivered him to bliss. Obviously, I don't truly believe D'Antoni's status with the Lakers truly impacted Magic in that way - but the act of embellishment by Magic is driven by hate.

That reveals a deep-rooted hatred inside him for another person based on what I'm assuming is something petty. I'd imagine we'd have heard about any racial/criminal dust-up between the two, which could cause someone to possess that type of contempt for another human to use a platform where you reach millions of people to celebrate their loss of a job.

I get worked up with the latest news being a major story because the public is focused on the surface issue (Sterling), which for all intensive purposes is totally meaningless in the big picture.

If one owner of an NBA team mistreats an employee because of their race, another mistreats their employee because of their religion, another mistreats their employee because of their sexuality and another mistreats their employee because they've grown to disagree about how they coach a game of basketball - what's the ****ing difference? Sterling actually wasn't caught "mistreating" any of his employees (again, I must reiterate I am not defending him nor think he shouldn't have been removed).

The essence of my feelings are that a hateful person shouldn't be allowed to be in a position of power (in any arena of life). What type of form that hate comes in (bigotry, vindictiveness, spite, etc.) is irrelevant.

It seems hypocritical to condemn one person, but celebrate another who is equally hateful yet not in the simple form of racism.

I hope that helps clear some of that up.

Gasp!

So you assume. Maybe D'Antoni treated him like a pos. You have no earthly clue what the Magic/D'Antoni things is about.

Equating a personal squabble between two people based solely on one slightly douchy twitter post by Magic to the racist rambling of Sterling is foolish.

Mountain out of a molehill.
 
Anyone who read much about the Lakers this year knew that D'Antoni and Magic were at odd. Magic's tweet was fully expected, surprised no one, and is really a non-story being blown out of proportion due to the Sterling thing, which itself has been blown all out of proportion by a media that feeds on sensationalism and panic.
 
Anyone who read much about the Lakers this year knew that D'Antoni and Magic were at odd. Magic's tweet was fully expected, surprised no one, and is really a non-story being blown out of proportion due to the Sterling thing, which itself has been blown all out of proportion by a media that feeds on sensationalism and panic.

Disagreed entirely that his tweet surprised no one. In fact, many prominent basketball people expressed suprise/disappointment. Whether they were just being self-righteous or not is up for debate. But I do agree the Sterling thing was blown out of proportion by the media, and consequently the sheep-like public , because of the surface talking points. My main point in my original post is that the owners of everything in this country being dicks isn't news.
 
I missed quite a few pages and don't care to read them all now.

Does this sum up what I missed?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4_COOh4VXw
 
He's family friendly; he does Coors commercials. He's practically a teddy bear. That is the face of N.W.A., and I'm sure you don't have to look up what that particular acronym stood for. At the end of the day, there's very little difference between the described hip-hop performance that supposedly contributes to negative african american culture and Johnny Cash constantly appearing as an outlaw while never serving a day of time. Somehow I don't think Johnny Cash had any real effect on criminality in the culture.

I'm pretty sure a mixture of Joe Walsh singing about Maserati's, The Doors about drugs, and Country singers about drinking themselves into comas is the reason Pearl Watson has 13 illegitimate children.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXWvKDSwvls

^Don't listen or you'll succumb to thug mentality. Or is it only bad when blackie sings about his money?
 
Equating a personal squabble between two people based solely on one slightly douchy twitter post by Magic to the racist rambling of Sterling is foolish.

Mountain out of a molehill.

I definitely did not equate the two in terms of saying tweeting about being happy a coach is gone is the same as telling your girlfriend you don't want her posing in pictures for the public to see with black or hispanic dudes. At least that certainly wasn't my intent.

I just wanted to illustrate the irony of the media/public's example of the gold standard of how an owner of an NBA team should be (Magic) PUBLICLY showing how big of a dirtbag he could be a day after another owner was banished for having his (what he though would be totally private) dirtbagginess recorded and released to the public.
 
I'm pretty sure a mixture of Joe Walsh singing about Maserati's, The Doors about drugs, and Country singers about drinking themselves into comas is the reason Pearl Watson has 13 illegitimate children.



^Don't listen or you'll succumb to thug mentality. Or is it only bad when blackie sings about his money?

You forgot about The Grateful Dead, Marvin Gaye, Mtume, Robert Palmer, Bob Dylan, Madonna, Prince, INXS, NIN, Eric Clapton, The Velvet Underground, Pink Floyd, The Rolling Stones, Tom Petty, Jane's Addiction and about a million others.

Preach Brotha about the eeeevils of music and the bizznezz.

p.s. you one of Pearl Watson's kids or sumthin? How you know so much?
 
You forgot about The Grateful Dead, Marvin Gaye, Mtume, Robert Palmer, Bob Dylan, Madonna, Prince, INXS, NIN, Eric Clapton, The Velvet Underground, Pink Floyd, The Rolling Stones, Tom Petty, Jane's Addiction and about a million others.

Preach Brotha about the eeeevils of music and the bizznezz.

p.s. you one of Pearl Watson's kids or sumthin? How you know so much?

What, no love for Insane Clown Posse? Poser.
 
My kids go to a charter school, no teachers union, no fancy tenure issues, bad teachers wash out, good ones are happy, and the school is very high performing.

Schools that get to pick and choose among students and can force out those that cause minor amounts of trouble will always out-perform those that take on the mission to educate every student, even those that are more difficult. If your charter school environment works for your kid's teachers, good for them. If you really think that personal politics and preferences don't play into decisions about which teachers are bad and which are good at your kids school, you're very naive.
 
Back
Top