I disagree with his inputs...
His calculations might be fine for all I know.
After the games are played, the inputs should be pretty well established.
Agreeing with that.
I disagree with his inputs...
His calculations might be fine for all I know.
After the games are played, the inputs should be pretty well established.
nah I read it, but 33% seems grossly off.
The 90% sounds off too, just a hunch, I'm going out on a limb on that one, but I think you were making up a bad number on that one too.
(disclaimer: numbers change a little if they're 8th by virtue of a coin toss, but the change is fairly small and works in our favor, so i didn't factor that in. it's the difference between 90% and 90.8% or something like that.)
So you admit your nerd post was flawed, then?
meh. i recognized as i was typing it that the odds in wiki change somewhat if instead of the 6-7-8 teams having 63, 43 and 28 ping pong ball combinations, respectively, they all had 44... i just decided that the difference was minute once you factored it in, so the essence of the equation wasn't going to change substantially.
wikipedia does indeed support the 90%.
I'd peg the chances of the Spurs losing the last game around 10%.
was said in humor .. totally.
Wizards are putting Cavs away. Looks like the new worst case (and most likely) is simply a two way tie for the 8th worst record.
Also, Morris Almond has an assist.