What's new

Mark Jackson is so much better

Yeah, Mark Jackson is better than Ty. Talk about faint, faint praise.

Isn't that my point? That's how bad Corbin is and that's why he needs to be fired immediately.

We could sign Chris Paul this summer. We could win the #1 pick in the lottery. Lebron could demand to be traded to the great state of Salt Lake City for a bag of salt water taffy and it wouldn't matter because we have one of the worst coaches in the entire association as our head coach!

Was there ever a game where he out coached the opponent? Looking back, was there a single game where his coaching won us a game? While, I can remember several where his coaching cost us
 
You may want to check their injury list. How many games did bogut, lee, Thompson, and curry miss?

57 total, with 50 of those coming from Bogut, who hasn't been a big part of the Warriors' success, unless you count his replacing a healthy Monta Ellis as part of the Warriors' success in keeping their pick last year.
 
How do you explain Denver having a higher seed than GSW then? I'd argue they have similar talent to HOU and Jazz... They're starting Koufos for crying out loud.

Only because they have a Top-3 coach in the Western Conference. George Karl isn't the best, but he has maximized the potential of that roster, and I don't think anyone disagrees with that. He should be COY hands down.
 
Only because they have a Top-3 coach in the Western Conference. George Karl isn't the best, but he has maximized the potential of that roster, and I don't think anyone disagrees with that. He should be COY hands down.

Let's put it this way - if he was coaching the Jazz, we'd be 5th seed in the playoffs, easily. E-A-S-I-L-Y.
 
Your logic is flawed. Golden state tanked last year and probably should have been an eight seed. They have tons of talent on that team, and should probably be better than they are now. I refuse to ever say that mark Jackson is good at anything other than dying a slow miserable, Venerial disease ridden death. I will never forget how he treated Stockton and Malone.

This as well!
 
So basically... We waste yet another year? Awesome.

Have you even seen Corbin? His system... Both offensively and defensively? Sucks! Rotations? Horrible. Use of timeouts? Pathetic. Out of bounds plays? Non-existent. Motivation? Rarely do we play hard. Communication? horrid. the way he brushed off losses and pissed off fans was unbelievable. And overall improvement? Haven't seen it.

Do we really need to waste another year before we recognize that he just isn't cut out to be a head coach?

well, everyone will get what he deserves

next year can be a good season, but also a bad one, imagine Favors and Hayward could go because of Corbin

i think Corbin is a waste of time and always thought so, but i can be wrong, so next year will be very fun to watch anyway
 
I can't even watch the Playoffs because of things like this. Every time I see other teams mistakes I think oh boy some one on Jazzfanz would so be all over the Coach, or one of the players for doing the exact same thing that I just saw player "x" do.

For example I couldn't enjoy that buzzer beater by CP to put the Clipps over the Grizz because of the few minutes leading up to that point. CP turned it over (Tony Allen steal I believe) and then also he had the jump ball and then when they won the tip he didn't know how much time was left on the shot clock and had to heave up an almost half court shot, the Clipps P&R defense to give Marc Gasol a easy dunk to tie the game. Also when CP did hit the game winner I was wondering how Mike Conley who was only 1-2 steps away didn't help Tony Allen and stop CP from driving.

Celtics vs Knicks I watched the final 6-7min of the 2nd Qtr and again I could name numerous examples (most obvious one was Pierces careless TO in the final 30sec of the 2nd Qtr trying to force a 2 for 1) and even the same game Thriller mentions I saw a lot of the 2nd QTR and again could point out examples of them doing something that would get the players or coaches killed here on Jazzfanz.

My point is if you are looking for something you'll find it or convince yourself you found it anyway.
 
Than Ty Corbin. Think Ty would have ever switched into a zone to slow down Denver's offense? Nope! He's motivating, got his guys playing disciplined, has a clear system and defined roles for his players, and is innovative in his strategies. Basically, everything our coach is not.

We can make all the changes to our roster that we want. Ultimately, we will need to find ourselves a coach. Sooner or later, we need to fire Ty and get a real coach.

To me, the crucial thing here is that Golden State improved dramatically over last year, made the playoffs, won a playoff game, and are in a position to win a first round series DESPITE starting and giving significant playing time to a rookie and a second year player. On the other hand, the Jazz FO narrative is that starting and giving significant playing time to the C4 would necessarily result in a drop in performance thus necessitating starting and giving significant playing time to journeymen veterans.

It's a real shame that we've wasted two years and ZERO playoff wins now before actually testing whether this narrative is accurate.

I for one don't buy into the narrative. It may be true, but it may not, and GS' performance suggests that it is not necessarily true. Of course other teams play rookies and young players and don't do well (e.g., Charlotte), but I'm confident that our younger players are significantly better as a group. At the very least, I would like to have seen this narrative actually tested rather than waste two years because the FO was too scared to take a risk.
 
I can't even watch the Playoffs because of things like this. Every time I see other teams mistakes I think oh boy some one on Jazzfanz would so be all over the Coach, or one of the players for doing the exact same thing that I just saw player "x" do.

For example I couldn't enjoy that buzzer beater by CP to put the Clipps over the Grizz because of the few minutes leading up to that point. CP turned it over (Tony Allen steal I believe) and then also he had the jump ball and then when they won the tip he didn't know how much time was left on the shot clock and had to heave up an almost half court shot, the Clipps P&R defense to give Marc Gasol a easy dunk to tie the game. Also when CP did hit the game winner I was wondering how Mike Conley who was only 1-2 steps away didn't help Tony Allen and stop CP from driving.

Celtics vs Knicks I watched the final 6-7min of the 2nd Qtr and again I could name numerous examples (most obvious one was Pierces careless TO in the final 30sec of the 2nd Qtr trying to force a 2 for 1) and even the same game Thriller mentions I saw a lot of the 2nd QTR and again could point out examples of them doing something that would get the players or coaches killed here on Jazzfanz.

My point is if you are looking for something you'll find it or convince yourself you found it anyway.

I dont get mad at corbin for his players making mistakes like the ones you mentioned..... i get mad at corbin for not playing his best players the most minutes.

If corbin was coaching the warriors then richard jefferson would play 30 minutes per game while harrison barnes gets dnp's.
Klay thompson would get around 20 minutes per game.
Jarret jack would start and play 30+ minutes while curry would only get about 20 minutes per game.

Corbin coaching the nuggets would mean that kenneth faried would never play.
 
To me, the crucial thing here is that Golden State improved dramatically over last year, made the playoffs, won a playoff game, and are in a position to win a first round series DESPITE starting and giving significant playing time to a rookie and a second year player. On the other hand, the Jazz FO narrative is that starting and giving significant playing time to the C4 would necessarily result in a drop in performance thus necessitating starting and giving significant playing time to journeymen veterans.

It's a real shame that we've wasted two years and ZERO playoff wins now before actually testing whether this narrative is accurate.

I for one don't buy into the narrative. It may be true, but it may not, and GS' performance suggests that it is not necessarily true. Of course other teams play rookies and young players and don't do well (e.g., Charlotte), but I'm confident that our younger players are significantly better as a group. At the very least, I would like to have seen this narrative actually tested rather than waste two years because the FO was too scared to take a risk.

This.
repped.
 
Than Ty Corbin. Think Ty would have ever switched into a zone to slow down Denver's offense? Nope! He's motivating, got his guys playing disciplined, has a clear system and defined roles for his players, and is innovative in his strategies. Basically, everything our coach is not.

We can make all the changes to our roster that we want. Ultimately, we will need to find ourselves a coach. Sooner or later, we need to fire Ty and get a real coach.

This is like saying I'd rather clean up dog crap than human crap.

I'm also going to go on record and say it was a fluke. When was the last time a whole team shot 64% in a playoff game?
 
Ok. You convinced me. Jackson is a way better coach. Ty would have never figured out how to tank that hard and get a top 7 pick, while still having a decent team who could have made the playoffs. That tank job was a thing of beauty. I mean look at our pick now, it went from number 8 last year to 21 this year! That right there should make him coach of the year. What other coach besides pat Riley can claim to be a good gm as well?
 
Fighting over who's better between Jackson and Corbin isn't saying much. When shooters like Thompson and Curry get hot, you will see instances where that team looks like world beaters for one game. I'm sure if they shot 64% every night, they'd be world champs. Maybe this series goes 6 games. Maybe. Jackson is a scrub. Maybe he's better than Corbin, but it's not by much. On the nights Randy Foye was hot and 3's were dropping, Corbin looked like a pretty good coach too.

LOL'ing at the fact that this thread was even started.
 
I dont get mad at corbin for his players making mistakes like the ones you mentioned..... i get mad at corbin for not playing his best players the most minutes.

If corbin was coaching the warriors then richard jefferson would play 30 minutes per game while harrison barnes gets dnp's.
Klay thompson would get around 20 minutes per game.
Jarret jack would start and play 30+ minutes while curry would only get about 20 minutes per game.

Corbin coaching the nuggets would mean that kenneth faried would never play.
My point was more along the lines that no matter who would be at fault I can spot similar mistakes by other coaches or players in the game (players more so just because this is a players game/league).

As far as to what you said there is probably some truth to it and believe the Harrison Barnes comment may be close to true not really so sure about the rest.
 
I dont get mad at corbin for his players making mistakes like the ones you mentioned..... i get mad at corbin for not playing his best players the most minutes.

If corbin was coaching the warriors then richard jefferson would play 30 minutes per game while harrison barnes gets dnp's.
Klay thompson would get around 20 minutes per game.
Jarret jack would start and play 30+ minutes while curry would only get about 20 minutes per game.

Corbin coaching the nuggets would mean that kenneth faried would never play.

These were my thoughts, minus the few minutes for Curry. That guy would still play.
 
I dont get mad at corbin for his players making mistakes like the ones you mentioned..... i get mad at corbin for not playing his best players the most minutes.

If corbin was coaching the warriors then richard jefferson would play 30 minutes per game while harrison barnes gets dnp's.
Klay thompson would get around 20 minutes per game.
Jarret jack would start and play 30+ minutes while curry would only get about 20 minutes per game.

Corbin coaching the nuggets would mean that kenneth faried would never play.

Possibly true on Barnes. He would probably be getting Burks minutes. He has sucked for most of the year though. Maybe playing in a small lineup where he is technically the PF is better for him though.

Thompson would probably get Hayward minutes.

Curry statement is just ridiculous.

Who would Corbin play over Fahried? I would actually argue that he would get more minutes under Corbin because I don't think Corbin would want to go to small ball as much as Karl does.
 
Back
Top