D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Actually kinda sad this coup seems to misfire. That reckless clown should be removed for his abuse of power.
the last thing Turkey needs is the military showing them that their democratic system is a sham
Actually kinda sad this coup seems to misfire. That reckless clown should be removed for his abuse of power.
the last thing Turkey needs is the military showing them that their democratic system is a sham
why? a power vacuum is better from my pov than another dictator in that region.
a dictator that ppl choose is better than an imposed government that the people can't hold accountable. If a coup was thrown against a head of state who had already destroyed democracy, it would be a different conversation.
So you'd rather watch him reintroduce death sentence, imprison more ppl for speaking their mind(Currently nearly half the journalists have pending trials for reporting on topics in a way that wasn't clearly in favor of Erdogan)
maybe attempt to change the constitution and become president for lifetime with the option to pass that title to a family member?
That dude is as crooked as they come.
My favorite would be separation of the Western regions where Erdogan's party lacks support.
Yes. The people elected him, and they can elect someone else if they don't like him.
That's when a coup becomes the lesser of two evils. Since this hasn't happened, and hasn't been attempted, the discussion is moot. I'd rather not entrust a nation to its military, and hope they'll gracefully hand it back to the people. They usually don't. See what happened in Egypt. How did that turn out? And my family members also expressed the same sentiment. "But Morsi is a dictator!".
why? a power vacuum is better from my pov than another dictator in that region.
Yes. The people elected him, and they can elect someone else if they don't like him.
That's when a coup becomes the lesser of two evils. Since this hasn't happened, and hasn't been attempted, the discussion is moot. I'd rather not entrust a nation to its military, and hope they'll gracefully hand it back to the people. They usually don't. See what happened in Egypt. How did that turn out? And my family members also expressed the same sentiment. "But Morsi is a dictator!".
America (but that was a different world, and I don't disagree with your point)Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Libya... The list goes on and on...
I honestly can't think of a single case where a coup actually brought on positive results.
Can anyone point to where a coup triggered the desired result? I can't.
a dictator that ppl choose is better than an imposed government that the people can't hold accountable. If a coup was thrown against a head of state who had already destroyed democracy, it would be a different conversation.
Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Libya... The list goes on and on...
I honestly can't think of a single case where a coup actually brought on positive results.
Can anyone point to where a coup triggered the desired result? I can't.
I'd rather not entrust a nation to its military, and hope they'll gracefully hand it back to the people. They usually don't. See what happened in Egypt. How did that turn out? And my family members also expressed the same sentiment. "But Morsi is a dictator!".
The coup in thailand that happened 2 years ago that led to the current military government I can honestly say is a successful and a positive one. They have successfully uprooted some deep rooted and engrained corrupted systems and officials/policemen/comnected well off elites and for the most part has brought about a peaceful and joyous 2 years for the people there.Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Libya... The list goes on and on...
I honestly can't think of a single case where a coup actually brought on positive results.
Can anyone point to where a coup triggered the desired result? I can't.
The coup in thailand that happened 2 years ago that led to the current military government I can honestly say is a successful and a positive one. They have successfully uprooted some deep rooted and engrained corrupted systems and officials/policemen/comnected well off elites and for the most part has brought about a peaceful and joyous 2 years for the people there.
The world as a whole has frown upon the coup at the time and even now.. but unless you are the actual people living there you don't know what it's really like in the old days vs now. Granted it's not entirely democratic but it has worked.
So why did the democratic system fail? Because the Party that always get voted in knows how to pursuade the under priviledged and the under educated living in rural areas that accounts for 70-80% compared to the 20-30% of the better off well educated people living in the main cities (there are 70+ million people in thailand only 10-20 million of which I would say are well off and educated). The popular Party is owned by one of the richest man in the world afterall... and vote buying is the norm.
So yes sometime the democratic process still fail in many parts of the world sadly....
America (but that was a different world, and I don't disagree with your point)
I wouldn't consider the American Revolution a coup.
Hell, one of the problems Washington had was getting the Continental Congress to authorize payments and supplies for the forming and training of a continental army.
It's my understanding that a coup is a quick overthrow of a government usually involving a general or series of generals.
That doesn't describe the American Revolution at all. For years there was propaganda and threats of independence.
The Boston Massacre was 6 years before the Dec of Ind. the Boston Tea Act was a full 3 years before the Dec of Ind was drafted.
You teach kids stuff?
Revolution is the end part of rebellion. At that phase, you ultimately change the the structure of whether regime, social structure, government or something else that is essential to the lives of the people.I guess I think of coups, rebellions and revolutions as different things.
I think of a coup as a group within an established nation attempting to seize control quickly.
A rebellion is when part of a nation breaks off and goes to war with the the parent nation.
Revolution is a term used by rebels to make what they're doing sound better.
Revolution is the end part of rebellion. At that phase, you ultimately change the the structure of whether regime, social structure, government or something else that is essential to the lives of the people.
Rebellion is the action of rising up against the oppressor, while revolution is something that carries on for years, sometimes decades to see if the results are the way you want. Because a social structure of a society does not change too easily.