What's new
By:

NAOS vs. Hack thread

PKM said:
I'm lost. I thought that had been established a long long time ago. The story may have evolved because at first I wasn't sure, but was later cleared up. I know trout still likes to say you didn't show up but I am of the impression everyone knows you did.

Was that better?
Click to expand...

I asked you a straight question and I get this answer. Cool, guy.
 
The cliquishness doesn't bother me. The circle jerking in the Jazz forum makes it unbearable to read, and it has nothing to do with a clique 95% of the time.
 
franklin said:
The cliquishness doesn't bother me. The circle jerking in the Jazz forum makes it unbearable to read, and it has nothing to do with a clique 95% of the time.
Click to expand...

I never said it was a majority or even more than 5% (if we have to quantify). However it's quantified, the cliquishness is too loud in the mix. It's like middle school.
 
NAOS said:
I never said it was a majority or even more than 5% (if we have to quantify). However it's quantified, the cliquishness is too loud in the mix. It's like middle school.
Click to expand...

I agree. Let's work together to combat the cliques!
 
PKM said:
I honestly don't remember how the story began and ran.. But I confess I fan the flames for entertainment purposes.
Truth is this, though.. Trout was hanging around and according to him he was waiting to hear from you.. And waiting....
Click to expand...

Truth: I posted my driving progress every two hours +/- in a thread for all to see. Plus, I arrived early.

PKM said:
He told me he had to be in SLC that evening but he wasn't about to leave. I volunteered that you may not show up and it would be a total punk to make him sit and wait all night and miss his next day's meeting. So I told him he should just go and IF you showed up I could vouch that trout was there but left thinking you were standing him up.

I admit that story probably wasn't sexy enough for me. But I later came clean after I got bored with the story. Feel free to copy and paste this into the thread.
Click to expand...

You'd feel better if you came clean about other stuff, too.
 
NAOS said:
I never said it was a majority or even more than 5% (if we have to quantify). However it's quantified, the cliquishness is too loud in the mix. It's like middle school.
Click to expand...

All I said was it doesn't bother me. The main issue I have is crowding out new members who say something against The Community Standard. The only new members these days act like alts. The lesser posting members are ignored even when making excellent points, and the high post count members are responded to in volume even when dumping trash.


I do think it's pretty sad when a few pile on you, with Dalamon inevitably coming in with his NAOS got pwned hahalolz bit. However, you crack me up in these exchanges and usually gets the better of all of them combined so I chime in. It's a guilty pleasure of mine, and the thing I laugh the hardest about here. They probably dog pile for the same reason -- so you'll make them laugh.
 
franklin said:
and usually gets the better of all of them combined so I chime in.
Click to expand...

I know you and naos always get the better of me.
I suck at arguing and trash talking. I always get my *** kicked in those types of exchanges.
 
NAOS said:
Truth: I posted my driving progress every two hours +/- in a thread for all to see. Plus, I arrived early.



You'd feel better if you came clean about other stuff, too.
Click to expand...

LOL, like what? This is kinda fun.
 
NAOS said:
You'd feel better if you came clean about other stuff, too.
Click to expand...

I assume you are referring to our PM exchange of the past 10 minutes? Okay.

PKM said:
NAOS said:
PKM said:
NAOS said:
1. You (and talking about you the person here, not the accounts you run on JCF) saw me in person, waiting for Trout. Even after that, you did you best to defend Trout's story, even though you knew there wasn't a shred of truth in it. Just enough to fuel the haters (and there has been a lot of blatantly personal and disrespectful things said.... mostly by a shower of alts that you know are being run on this site).

2. You have been the most active JFC poster in the history of the board, so you have a damn good sense of how the story has "evolved" and for how it's used in cliquish ways. Playing dumb was cute

I asked you a straight question and got the most sinuous piece of turd. You could have done better, and the fact that you didn't lets me know what you're about. Definitely in it for the dramady. #giggles.

I honestly don't care very much, but it does make it harder to hang out here. And you're the chief of fanning the flames when you want to be.
Click to expand...

I honestly don't remember how the story began and ran.. But I confess I fan the flames for entertainment purposes.
Truth is this, though.. Trout was hanging around and according to him he was waiting to hear from you.. And waiting. He told me he had to be in SLC that evening but he wasn't about to leave. I volunteered that you may not show up and it would be a total punk to make him sit and wait all night and miss his next day's meeting. So I told him he should just go and IF you showed up I could vouch that trout was there but left thinking you were standing him up.
I admit that story probably wasn't sexy enough for me. But I later came clean after I got bored with the story. Feel free to copy and paste this into the thread.

And, let me be honest, the reason the site is difficult for you (your words) has nothing to do with the Trout thing. It's because your on-site persona is a snobbish douchebag. An intellectual elitist that tries his best to degrade.
I assumed you relished the role, tbh..
I would be happy to be first in line to change your persona if you so desired.
Click to expand...

Funny how you get to tell me why it's harder for me to hang out around here.
Click to expand...

Funny how you bring it up, to me, in a PM and then proceed to complain that I replied to it.
And there is not a single poster on this entire site that would disagree with me on that item.
Click to expand...

Am I doing better yet, NAOS?
 
PKM said:
I assume you are referring to our PM exchange of the past 10 minutes? Okay.



Am I doing better yet, NAOS?
Click to expand...

Let's hear more about your propensity to fan flames for your own entertainment. For example, tell us about all the alts you know are being run, from the moment of their launch, and how you help give credence to them, ya know, for fun.
 
PKM said:
Funny how you bring it up, to me, in a PM and then proceed to complain that I replied to it.
And there is not a single poster on this entire site that would disagree with me on that item.
Click to expand...

So now we're crowd sourcing for my answer as to why it's harder for me to hangout here? Will this get us closer to the truth?
 
NAOS said:
So now we're crowd sourcing for my answer as to why it's harder for me to hangout here? Will this get us closer to the truth?
Click to expand...
No one crowd sourced. I stated it as a fact. Whether it is or isn't is up for debate.
It is really unbelievable to me how incredibly unaware you are (or seem to be) of self. I know when I'm being a douche.
You can't seriously think people rag on you because of the Trout thing, can you?
 
NAOS said:
Let's hear more about your propensity to fan flames for your own entertainment. For example, tell us about all the alts you know are being run, from the moment of their launch, and how you help give credence to them, ya know, for fun.
Click to expand...

I actually know of zero alts. I know of one poster that is on the board under a new name that was earlier banned.. but that's it.
Not that any of that matters, at all.

I will give you credit though, you do cry hard.
 
PKM said:
No one crowd sourced. I stated it as a fact. Whether it is or isn't is up for debate.
It is really unbelievable to me how incredibly unaware you are (or seem to be) of self. I know when I'm being a douche.
You can't seriously think people rag on you because of the Trout thing, can you?
Click to expand...

You factually stated my answer to my reason? Or did I state my own reason? How confused have you made yourself?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top