What's new
By:

NAOS vs. Hack thread

dalamon said:
I liked NAOS before his size-huge thing. I even remember defending him against a bunch of Mormon dudes (Trout comes to mind) in this massive discussion a couple years back. Trout was a pretty big ******* to him back then, IIRC (maybe I'm confusing it with another poster).

That's not too surprising though-- I generally get along with nearly every poster on this forum. Atheist, Mormon, Turkish, whatever. I used to argue with AKMVP tonnes, but I think we're on quite good terms. Franklin had a pretty random meltdown in this conversation I was having with him (he ended up self-banning himself afterwards)-- but I used to really think highly of him as a poster. I've said some inflammatory things to colton before, but I do like him. Past that, I try to be non hive-mind, and non circle-jerk, and pretty inviting/respectful of most posters. Yes, I acknowledge I'm not perfect.


I really don't know why we talk about NAOS so much-- I'm thinking the reason he tries to 'call out the clique' is due to the attention we give him. Why the **** do I care what NAOS thinks of me? Literally the entire forum probably thinks the opposite. While I do think some of his points are valid (fish used to be unreal obnoxious about Burks, and even I told him to cut it out) sometimes the dude is an *** purely to be an ***, and we validate it when we respond to him.
Click to expand...


You're head is too big. My absence had nothing to do with your Dalamommy "you should post in a way that's satisfying to me, son" rant. And I didn't self-ban, whatever that means.


LogGrad98 said:
You're feisty after your hiatus. Got some pent up, um, stuff there?

Is it about time for you to find your next victim? The dark passenger getting to you maybe?
Click to expand...

You read that the wrong way. Fish is an excellent debater.
 
franklin said:
You're head is too big. My absence had nothing to do with your Dalamommy "you should post in a way that's satisfying to me, son" rant.
Click to expand...
And I didn't self-ban, whatever that means.
Click to expand...

I was consistently respectful to you while you were being pretty insulting-- not sure why you're characterizing it as a rant by me (not to mention that very unfair characterization to begin with).

Regardless, it's in the past now, and I don't wanna talk about this as soon as you've come back. I'm glad you've decided to post again, and I hope my 'big head' doesn't get in your way.


And I didn't self-ban, whatever that means.
Click to expand...

Oh ok-- it just seemed like you cancelled your account or something right afterwards.
 
dalamon said:
I was consistently respectful to you while you were being pretty insulting-- not sure why you're characterizing it as a rant by me (not to mention that very unfair characterization to begin with).

Regardless, it's in the past now, and I don't wanna talk about this as soon as you've come back. I'm glad you've decided to post again, and I hope my 'big head' doesn't get in your way.




Oh ok-- it just seemed like you cancelled your account or something right afterwards.
Click to expand...

You took a friendly joke as a jab, and I probably misread some things the wrong way as well. I don't really remember but I do apologize for escalating it. For the record, I considered what you said and will try (again) to post in a style that doesn't come across so caustic. Honestly though, I don't have a lot of hope. People here beg to play the troll victim and I don't have it me to back down from a useless internet argument.
 
franklin said:
You took a friendly joke as a jab, and I probably misread some things the wrong way as well. I don't really remember but I do apologize for escalating it. For the record, I considered what you said and will try (again) to post in a style that doesn't come across so caustic. Honestly though, I don't have a lot of hope. People here beg to play the troll victim and I don't have it me to back down from a useless internet argument.
Click to expand...

everybody here is good people playing various roles/personas. it's all good.
 
franklin said:
You took a friendly joke as a jab, and I probably misread some things the wrong way as well. I don't really remember but I do apologize for escalating it. For the record, I considered what you said and will try (again) to post in a style that doesn't come across so caustic. Honestly though, I don't have a lot of hope. People here beg to play the troll victim and I don't have it me to back down from a useless internet argument.
Click to expand...

You have given out too much Reputation in the last 24 hours, try again later.

I'll tone down the bigheadedness wherever applicable.
 
I suck at writing. By big head I was talking about you thinking you might have ran me off. It wasn't a slight, more of one of those passing comments like "hey, don't give him a big head".
 
franklin said:
You're head is too big. My absence had nothing to do with your Dalamommy "you should post in a way that's satisfying to me, son" rant. And I didn't self-ban, whatever that means.




You read that the wrong way. Fish is an excellent debater.
Click to expand...

Would you say he is a....masterdebater?
 
I still think Hack wins.

franklin said:
I suck at writing. By big head I was talking about you thinking you might have ran me off. It wasn't a slight, more of one of those passing comments like "hey, don't give him a big head".
Click to expand...

This is the cutest development of the thread, tbh. Can you imagine how ugly your children are going to be? Will they get your baby face or Dallymong's 3-hour beard?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top