I liked NAOS before his size-huge thing. I even remember defending him against a bunch of Mormon dudes (Trout comes to mind) in this massive discussion a couple years back. Trout was a pretty big ******* to him back then, IIRC (maybe I'm confusing it with another poster).
That's not too surprising though-- I generally get along with nearly every poster on this forum. Atheist, Mormon, Turkish, whatever. I used to argue with AKMVP tonnes, but I think we're on quite good terms. Franklin had a pretty random meltdown in this conversation I was having with him (he ended up self-banning himself afterwards)-- but I used to really think highly of him as a poster. I've said some inflammatory things to colton before, but I do like him. Past that, I try to be non hive-mind, and non circle-jerk, and pretty inviting/respectful of most posters. Yes, I acknowledge I'm not perfect.
I really don't know why we talk about NAOS so much-- I'm thinking the reason he tries to 'call out the clique' is due to the attention we give him. Why the **** do I care what NAOS thinks of me? Literally the entire forum probably thinks the opposite. While I do think some of his points are valid (fish used to be unreal obnoxious about Burks, and even I told him to cut it out) sometimes the dude is an *** purely to be an ***, and we validate it when we respond to him.