What's new

Never Hillary

Do people still believe Benghazi was HC's fault? That is the most ridiculous witch hunt I have seen.

Yes, they act like she pretty much put the attackers up to it.

What I find funny are people that are hung up on her assessment of why it happened. I mean there was a cartoon the was offensive to some Muslims and there were people outside the embassy protesting and there also appears to have been an organized group of "terrorists" who took advantage of the chaos and attacked the embassy. So first report is that the angry mob got out of control and attacked the embassy. Turns out it wasn't the angry mob, and that eventually got cleared up. I don't really see the issue there. It certainly doesn't put the blood on Hillary's hands like the pathetic woman at the convention last night seemed to think.

It's really hard for me to understand why Benghazi is such a condemnation of Hillary.

Oh wait, there was some back and fourth on what it would mean on a larger scale to send in uniformed marines, vs non-uniformed marines, etc. I mean, we're 'murica and we should have just sent in the cavalry guns blazing in a foreign nation. Should have just killed anything that moved and figured out what was up and what sort of broader conflict we had started after the fact. Forget that it's very possible that no military response would have changed the outcome. And I'm sure Hillary told the military leaders to shut their mouths and keep their opinions to themselves because she was flipping a coin in regard to whether or not they should wear their green hats or their black hats. And she held their aircraft on the tarmac until she made her decision. It's such a lame story I hear from those who blame her. It's hard to take it seriously at all except they act like it was the worse thing that has ever been done.

Following in the strategy to keep throwing **** against the wall until something sticks now I guess Hillary sold all of the Uranium in the U.S. straight to Putin.

Once that gets exposed as just another load of horse **** I wonder what the next load of **** will be.
 
Yes, they act like she pretty much put the attackers up to it.

What I find funny are people that are hung up on her assessment of why it happened. I mean there was a cartoon the was offensive to some Muslims and there were people outside the embassy protesting and there also appears to have been an organized group of "terrorists" who took advantage of the chaos and attacked the embassy. So first report is that the angry mob got out of control and attacked the embassy. Turns out it wasn't the angry mob, and that eventually got cleared up. I don't really see the issue there. It certainly doesn't put the blood on Hillary's hands like the pathetic woman at the convention last night seemed to think.

It's really hard for me to understand why Benghazi is such a condemnation of Hillary.

Oh wait, there was some back and fourth on what it would mean on a larger scale to send in uniformed marines, vs non-uniformed marines, etc. I mean, we're 'murica and we should have just sent in the cavalry guns blazing in a foreign nation. Should have just killed anything that moved and figured out what was up and what sort of broader conflict we had started after the fact. Forget that it's very possible that no military response would have changed the outcome. And I'm sure Hillary told the military leaders to shut their mouths and keep their opinions to themselves because she was flipping a coin in regard to whether or not they should wear their green hats or their black hats. And she held their aircraft on the tarmac until she made her decision. It's such a lame story I hear from those who blame her. It's hard to take it seriously at all except they act like it was the worse thing that has ever been done.

Following in the strategy to keep throwing **** against the wall until something sticks now I guess Hillary sold all of the Uranium in the U.S. straight to Putin.

Once that gets exposed as just another load of horse **** I wonder what the next load of **** will be.
You are obviously determined to ignoring both the facts and the reasons that some people believe the facts matter.
It's been discussed ad nauseum, though. No point in going through it all again.
 
You are obviously determined to ignoring both the facts and the reasons that some people believe the facts matter.
It's been discussed ad nauseum, though. No point in going through it all again.
No kidding. Please stop responding to me. I'm done.
 
What rubbish.

Please explain. One or the other will be President. Do you agree that either Trump or Hillary will be President and that no one else has a chance?

You'd be wrong to think that I am in love with Hillary. But I support Hillary over Trump, therefore I support Hillary. Let's not play semantics.
 
Please explain. One or the other will be President. Do you agree that either Trump or Hillary will be President and that no one else has a chance? Or you could just not vote.

No one else has a chance because of mind sets like this. It is not an A or B choice and never has been. Fooling people into thinking it has led to this two party dominance and resultant corruption. And they have utterly failed the American people at every level. I for one openly reject them both. Them and their parties.

You want to promote this false premise of a vote for "x" is support for "y" than go ahead. I reject it outright.
 
No one else has a chance because of mind sets like this. It is not an A or B choice and never has been. Fooling people into thinking it has led to this two party dominance and resultant corruption. And they have utterly failed the American people at every level. I for one openly reject them both. Them and their parties.

You want to promote this false premise of a vote for "x" is support for "y" than go ahead. I reject it outright.

I agree with you, I have voted both Republican and Democrat and I see both parties for what they have become. I'm bummed that a strong independent didn't insert themselves into this race. I'm not a fan of Bloomberg since he's a left winger but maybe he could have been a stronger Ross Perot-type and propelled us down the path towards a viable third party in the future. That doesn't change the fact that only two people have a chance for the Presidency this time, it's either Hillary or Trump.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top