D
Deleted member 848
Guest
What are these genes that black skinned people have that make them better at athletics? Pls list them Mr AltRight
Never Trump
- Thread starter colton
- Start date
What are these genes that black skinned people have that make them better at athletics? Pls list them Mr AltRight
Garbage. Even for you. I have never claimed to be offended by anything, nor do I care if anyone is offended by anything i said.
Small point of fact. There is more genetic diversity in people who are descended from Africa (aka black people) then in all the rest of humanity combined. So it's safe to say that a person who happens to have black skin will represent some of the greatest extremes. So while there may be people who are black who are excellent at jumping there is very likely a population of black people who are well below average at track and field.
There is a tribe in Africa that has the tallest average height and another that has the shortest average height.
So if you see skin color and assume that person can jump high you're making a false assumption.
There is a tribe in Africa that has the tallest average height and another that has the shortest average height.
So if you see skin color and assume that person can jump high you're making a false assumption.
I said I don't judge people based on their race. I don't assume someone is racist beacuse he or she is an Arab. The doesn't mean I don't recognize that racism exists.
I don't directly associate Nazi Germany with Christianity, but Germany is a Western European country, so... Historically Christian.
Whatever Hitler was into, I have no idea. But Nazi Germany wasn't just Hitler. And I don't know that Nazi Germany justified themselves through their Christian beliefs or there was much of a focus on religion at all.
Whatever Hitler was into, I have no idea. But Nazi Germany wasn't just Hitler. And I don't know that Nazi Germany justified themselves through their Christian beliefs or there was much of a focus on religion at all.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
Not even close. Time of My Life was awesome. Lip reading was terrible.
Hotdog
Well-Known Member
Lol. Wtf. You are obviously trolling me. Have you even read anything. Why wouldnt you direct that to Cy?
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Antisemitism in the West is very much of Christian origin. All the way back to the early middle ages.
No it is not. Antisemitism has happen across cultural boundaries for similar reason. I do not remember the author but she basically showed how Semitic peoples have been targeted across space an time for singular reasons.
Name me one Semitic attack outside Christian west that was Kanye different.
Jonah
Well-Known Member
Hitler was born a Catholic but was not Christian as an adult. He was into Nietzsche. Hilter’s core advisors (Goebbels, Himmler, Heydrich and Bormann) were atheists. They misused and misread Nietzsche, using his concept of the ubermensch as an excuse for their ethics (beyond good and evil) and his "will to power" as their recruitment slogan. Zarathustra was common reading for Nazi soldiers. Nietzsche was an actual influence on Hitler, Christianity not nearly so much.
Jonah
Well-Known Member
Back to Trump and today’s events. Trump’s “just words” excuse for his predatory remarks against women is becoming less believable with each new sexual assault allegation that emerges. As of this evening, at least ten women have come forward with their stories and it’s not unreasonable to assume there will be more in the coming days and weeks.
Trump’s flat out denial of abuse at last Sunday’s debate opened the floodgates; a slap in the face to all those he abused, some of whom are now willing to put their names and the veracity of their claims before the public and under the intense scrutiny that will now follow them for the remainder of the campaign, and likely for years to come, just as it has for the women abused by Bill Clinton.
This is the end of Trump’s campaign. He will stagger on to an increasingly unhinged and angry finish, but by the time he gets there only his most ardent supporters will be able to stomach voting for him. The important question is how Trump will handle his concession speech, whether he can somehow find even a sliver of the necessary grace to calm his supporters disappointment. If not, I expect there could be an ugly reaction once reality finally sinks in on election night.
Trump’s flat out denial of abuse at last Sunday’s debate opened the floodgates; a slap in the face to all those he abused, some of whom are now willing to put their names and the veracity of their claims before the public and under the intense scrutiny that will now follow them for the remainder of the campaign, and likely for years to come, just as it has for the women abused by Bill Clinton.
This is the end of Trump’s campaign. He will stagger on to an increasingly unhinged and angry finish, but by the time he gets there only his most ardent supporters will be able to stomach voting for him. The important question is how Trump will handle his concession speech, whether he can somehow find even a sliver of the necessary grace to calm his supporters disappointment. If not, I expect there could be an ugly reaction once reality finally sinks in on election night.