What's new

Game Thread Nov 23, 2025 06:00PM MT: Los Angeles Lakers @ Utah Jazz

Added to Calendar: 11-23-25

That's not my point though. I'm not saying Cody is a good offensive player or that he makes our offense better. I'm not saying the offense couldn't be better with someone else taking his minutes. My point has been that he's not a tank commander, in the sense that he singlehandedly loses us games, which is the reason some posters think he should continue to play.

Up until last game he hadn't been so severely affecting our offense that he was single handedly losing us games. I don't think that's opinion.

It doesn't matter if he's dropping from 150 to 120 or from 120 to 90. That's still commanding a tank. Both make you lose the same amount. Cody's minutes (like everyone else) exist in specific set of circumstances and you can't really even assume it's "fine" by comparing it against the total net ratings. It would like comparing rush hour sales to total sales during the day.
 
It doesn't matter if he's dropping from 150 to 120 or from 120 to 90. That's still commanding a tank. Both make you lose the same amount. Cody's minutes (like everyone else) exist in specific set of circumstances and you can't really even assume it's "fine" by comparing it against the total net ratings. It would like comparing rush hour sales to total sales during the day.
You think we would have had a 150 ortg if Cody wasn't playing those minutes?

Lololol.
 
You think we would have had a 150 ortg if Cody wasn't playing those minutes?

Lololol.

150 is a made up number to illustrate the point. It doesn't matter if you are lowering an offensive rating from high to average or average to low. It's the same effect on tanking. You either believe Cody is the reason why the offensive rating is holding up when he's on the court or you believe it would be higher without him. That's where the opinion comes in.
 
Back
Top