bjacksonjazzfan
Well-Known Member
So, it really felt like I should make a post after lurking all day. I feel better having made said post.
Seems to be caught in tweener land. I'd rather have Carroll back as a true SF and then go out and get a young, physical guy at 6'10" or so who can come in and be the 4th big (assuming Paul or Al is re-signed.). If Paul AND Al are gone, the immediate need is a 3rd very good big to add to the rotation. Kanter and Favors can't play 48 mins each.
No I don't think they'll let them walk if possible. But I don't think he'll let them shaft us neither. Case in point - KOC let Mathews walk - that was a surprise wasn't it? All indications are that he's good for approx. $5m per, but KOC didn't think so.
Also if you look at the history of what KOC has done in the past, he signed Boozer & Okur in FAs, and I don't think anyone would argue that they aren't value for money. Matching of Millsap was good value for money. Same thing with the signings of Foye, Howard, Tinsley, Earl, all have been good value for money.
All indicators point towards them being prudent and not giving away free money. You've got to respect that and give them the benefit of the doubt, until they go out and sign a "bad contract" as you've stated. If that happens, then you can have a go, LOL..
And the Jazz FO likely considered the same options. WE need 3 bigs. No matter who starts and who comes off the bench, you can give 3 players 32 mins each. And with Favors, that will be a stretch due to his foul trouble. Jazz will re-sign either Paul or AL. And that player will start along with Favors. Kanter is fine coming off the bench. Then the Jazz take the best big available wioth one of their picks and a PG with the other, unless they can find better options by trading those picks to teams needing to dump a decent vet to get under the luxury tax limit.Well, just perusing an old Free Agent list, Byron Mullens as an RFA sticks out. From the UFA ranks, JJ Hickson and Amir Johnson are intriguing as possible backups. Hickson and Mullens seem unlikely, since they'll cost more.
And the Jazz FO likely considered the same options. WE need 3 bigs. No matter who starts and who comes off the bench, you can give 3 players 32 mins each. And with Favors, that will be a stretch due to his foul trouble. Jazz will re-sign either Paul or AL. And that player will start along with Favors. Kanter is fine coming off the bench. Then the Jazz take the best big available wioth one of their picks and a PG with the other, unless they can find better options by trading those picks to teams needing to dump a decent vet to get under the luxury tax limit.
WE need 3 bigs. No matter who starts and who comes off the bench, you can give 3 players 32 mins each. And with Favors, that will be a stretch due to his foul trouble. Jazz will re-sign either Paul or AL. And that player will start along with Favors. Kanter is fine coming off the bench. Then the Jazz take the best big available wioth one of their picks and a PG with the other, unless they can find better options by trading those picks to teams needing to dump a decent vet to get under the luxury tax limit.
.
There is no point in having picks at every position, even if lotto. Jazz cannot retain all of them when their contracts are up. They need to convert a couple of them into a high impact vet if this team has to make any progress. Unless one of the young guys(Favors or Burks) becomes a borderline all star or all star next season, they'll be in the lottery if they let Al/Paul walk away and rely on picks to fill the spots.
I doubt the Jazz even have a longterm blueprint for building a contending team. Lindsey is on record saying that Miller has instructed the management to "sell hope". Not a big shocker for those who know how the Millers and especially Greg operate. Its all about the bottomline. Do just about enough to get to that 5th-8th seed every year. Beyond that, if something falls out of the sky and we hit a jackpot then well and good. Otherwise keep selling dope err..hope.
Not bad. I'm not sure what his market value will be. Centers are generally overpaid. Hickson averages 13/10 in 30 mins per. That's decent production.I mean for the upcoming off season. Would 8 mil for Hickson for 3 years be a good choice? Would he get more? Would the Jazz offer that? Is that a good deal? Kanter, Favors, Hickson seems like a good trio.
I agree. I've always been on record saying the Jazz need to concentrate on getting a Core-8. The remaining 6-7 players are then vets on mimimum contracts or young draft picks. It does no good to go 3 deep at every position. You can;t find PT for everyone and you can't pay all those guys. The problem is that Utah will never have a superstar knock on their door. So they better try the Detroit model of having ZERO major weaknesses in their starting lineup and a very strong 3 behind those 5. I'm a lot higher on Burks, Favors, Kanter and Hayward than you are. I think we're seeing the makings of a very, very good team. Add a good PG to that mix and blend in glue guys like Carroll, Foye, Mo, etc. and this team could start making noise.There is no point in having picks at every position, even if lotto. Jazz cannot retain all of them when their contracts are up. They need to convert a couple of them into a high impact vet if this team has to make any progress. Unless one of the young guys(Favors or Burks) becomes a borderline all star or all star next season, they'll be in the lottery if they let Al/Paul walk away and rely on picks to fill the spots.
I doubt the Jazz even have a longterm blueprint for building a contending team. Lindsey is on record saying that Miller has instructed the management to "sell hope". Not a big shocker for those who know how the Millers and especially Greg operate. Its all about the bottomline. Do just about enough to get to that 5th-8th seed every year. Beyond that, if something falls out of the sky and we hit a jackpot then well and good. Otherwise keep selling dope err..hope.