Betting on things you have an emotional attachment is for fools.
Nah, I've won a lot more money than I've lost betting for/against the Jazz. Knowing what side of the spread they're going to land on is like a sixth sense.
Betting on things you have an emotional attachment is for fools.
Nah, I've won a lot more money than I've lost betting for/against the Jazz. Knowing what side of the spread they're going to land on is like a sixth sense.
Bet it then. What do I care if a fool is easily parted with his money?
Sometimes fools win.
I don't gamble because I've looked at the size of the casinos and it's pretty clear who is winning this game.
Interesting. So in other words, the odds makers believe the loss of Marvin and Jefferson and the addition of a better coach equals a net zero change in wins.
Guess the oddsmakers also believe Hayward will have another terrible shooting year
and Exum will be about equal to Tinsley/Garrett playing behind Burke. Also, if you follow Hollinger's PER rankings, Booker was much better than Marvin and Novak was about equal to Jefferson.
And, of course, no internal improvement from Gobert, Burke, etc.
If I were a betting man, I'd definitely take the over.