Police Brutality

[franklin]

Of course I Bean'd it, that was the idea. I do find it hard to believe that when it's all said and done, you actually do blame the cop for this. You'd make a great DUI lawyer.

That's just over the line and uncalled for. Good lawyers are obviously charismatic sales people like you.


Uugh. Everyone thinks I'm trolling ballz to get a reaction. I seriously need to give this bad habit up and learn how to write.

Tell you what. Define "this" and we'll go from there. I don't blame the cop for "this". I blame him for his actions just like I blame the girl for hers. I'm not a big fan of "you took my monkey dolley so I drop kicked your *** from atop the monkey bars" attitude.

 

[TroutBum]

That's just over the line and uncalled for. Good lawyers are obviously charismatic sales people like you.


Uugh. Everyone thinks I'm trolling ballz to get a reaction. I seriously need to give this bad habit up and learn how to write.

Tell you what. Define "this" and we'll go from there. I don't blame the cop for "this". I blame him for his actions just like I blame the girl for hers. I'm not a big fan of "you took my monkey dolley so I drop kicked your *** from atop the monkey bars" attitude.

Except I'm not charismatic at all. And I don't recall you blaming the girl for her actions at all. All I've seen in this thread from you is cries of police brutality and a bunch of old court cases. Again, how about we just wait and see who comes out on top of this thing? I'd put my money on the cop, because as I see it, he did nothing wrong.

 

[franklin]

I'd put my money on the cop, because as I see it, he did nothing wrong.

It's a good thing the nation tends to meet in the middle (where I am) instead of reacting to radical opinions like yours or its opposite.

If a taser case ever makes it to the supreme court I would not be surprised to see these categorized as lethal weapons by the current judges. Especially Sotomayor who appears to be nothing short of a glorified heroin junkie.

 

[Stoked]

It's a good thing the nation tends to meet in the middle (where I am) instead of reacting to radical opinions like yours or its opposite.

If a taser case ever makes it to the supreme court I would not be surprised to see these categorized as lethal weapons by the current judges. Especially Sotomayor who appears to be nothing short of a glorified heroin junkie.

Almost everyone thinks that they represent the middle.

 

[GVC]

I'm glad I don't have to live in a country where the penalty for fleeing a couple fender benders is death.

 

[Jazz Spazz]

I'm glad I don't have to live in a country where the penalty for fleeing a couple fender benders is death.

She's not dead, it's called a coma. It's not the penalty, it's an unfortunate result from the incident.

By the way, just for fun I looked this up for you.

https://members.fortunecity.com/brutalitycanada/names.html

This way you can complain about your own police officers.

 

[TroutBum]

She's not dead, it's called a coma. It's not the penalty, it's an unfortunate result from the incident.

I started to reply to GVC, but then saw that you said it much better. Also, LOL @ franklin being "in the middle", that's some funny **** right there.

 

[GVC]

I started to reply to GVC, but then saw that you said it much better. Also, LOL @ franklin being "in the middle", that's some funny **** right there.

Dude, I was hoping for a response from you. I'm disappointed. It's more than a little disingenuous to call the unsurprising consequence of a criminal act (that is, a serious injury caused by excessive force) "an unfortunate result from the incident".

And Franklin is far closer to the middle than you are to the left, despite your insistence that you're a "liberal". As far as I can tell, you're an authoritarian conservative who just happens to not hate ****. meh.

 

[Jazz Spazz]

It's more than a little disingenuous to call the unsurprising consequence of a criminal act (that is, a serious injury caused by excessive force) "an unfortunate result from the incident".

I'm glad I don't have to live in a country where the penalty for fleeing a couple fender benders is death.

I think you are the one being disingenuous.
You know the penalty by law for "fleeing a couple of fender benders" is not death.

I stand by what I said, and disagree with both points- that is not unsurprising, and your defining the tasing as a criminal act.

 

[TroutBum]

Dude, I was hoping for a response from you. I'm disappointed. It's more than a little disingenuous to call the unsurprising consequence of a criminal act (that is, a serious injury caused by excessive force) "an unfortunate result from the incident".

I can answer if you'd like. How do you NOT see it as an unfortunate result? Also, feel free to take away the "excessive force" bit, because there was none. I'm still amazed at how some people are viewing this. What if I told you that some girl got plastered, got in her car, and crashed it into a tree, killing herself -- and then blamed the tree and the owner of the property that that tree was on? Essentially that's what I'm hearing here. This girl has a history of breaking the law, was taken into custody, handcuffed and taken to jail where she tried to escape. She was put down with a taser while she was fleeing. Brutality? Give me a break. Go watch Rodney King or any of the thousands of youtube videos that show what real police brutality is, then come back here and tell me that the cop here was out of line and 'brutal'.

And Franklin is far closer to the middle than you are to the left, despite your insistence that you're a "liberal". As far as I can tell, you're an authoritarian conservative who just happens to not hate ****. meh.

I read it as franklin is in the middle of this particular debate, not choosing one side or the other -- which is ridiculous. If he meant "middle" as in political, then I missed his point and apologize. As for me being an authoritarian conservative, well, I guess if that's the way you see it, then so be it. If you want to look at what I really stand for and what I really believe instead of just slapping a label on me, then I think you'll find that you're way off.

 

[Stoked]

Dude, I was hoping for a response from you. I'm disappointed. It's more than a little disingenuous to call the unsurprising consequence of a criminal act (that is, a serious injury caused by excessive force) "an unfortunate result from the incident".And Franklin is far closer to the middle than you are to the left, despite your insistence that you're a "liberal". As far as I can tell, you're an authoritarian conservative who just happens to not hate ****. meh.

I must have missed the part where people hit with tasers fall into comas all the time.

 

[GVC]

I must have missed the part where people hit with tasers fall into comas all the time.

Uh...there have been over 500 taser-related deaths in America since 2001. Is that risk appropriate for someone who flees when being held for leaving the scene of a couple fender benders (I assume if they were more serious accidents, they'd be detailed in the news articles about the case)? I don't think so, and the law doesn't either. If a relatively harmless woman is held responsible for her minor crimes, shouldn't a police officer be held responsible for a careless, vicious, and likely fatal attack? Does anyone who breaks the law, no matter how irrational the law or how minor the offense, forfeit their life and liberty if they flee?