Oh I comprehended what you meant but responded to what you wrote.
I like accuracy and what your wrote appeared to be hyperbole to paint the front office in a bad light. You wrote: "at some point you do actually have to try to win something."
I mean duh. Everyone knows that the team and front office will start trying to win and prioritizing wins at some point. Why even type that out? Right now they are in asset accumulation mode less than 2 years in to a complete and total teardown of the roster.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
You literally responded to my statement as if I said it was a question of IF they would try to win. Only a complete idiot could interpret that statement like that.
It was never a question of IF the Jazz will try to win like your response. It’s a statement saying WHEN they try to win, they can be judged. I give them an incomplete grade until that point. I must say the point at which I will grade them. In order to specify that I will wait until they try to win, I must say it. That’s how language works. If I said I give them an incomplete grade, but never mentioned when I will actually grade them, you could not know what I meant.
If I said I will withhold judgement on TH until next year, I just say communicate that it’s next when I will do that. It is not a question of whether or not next year will happen. It is a statement saying I will wait until next year and I must say next year to make that statement. It’s different if I said next year, two years, three years. If you want to specify when you will do something you must say when you will do it.