What's new

Privileged by Kyle Korver

What about the big percentage of whites who didn't own slaves or hate blacks? There were plenty that fought against it making the US a staple in abolishing slavery.

Yes, that is true. How does that help you separate out "preserve their culture, national identity/ideology" from "preserve a white power structure"?
 
It's easy to separate non-racist based fears from racist based fears. Just because you dont think something like the notion of a war on Christmas is rational does not mean these fears and a want for preservation are based out of racism.

Would we agree that they are based on religious prejudice, instead?

I don't think people are racist because they want to burn wood in their fireplaces because that's American and telling them not to is an attack on their American way if life.

Who says don't burn wood? If anything, that would be carbon-neutral.

If we can agree on that and on to white nationalists, what do you see as a rise in white nationalism?

This is what I said:
If you mean that, as a percentage of the population or as a part of government policy, white nationalism has not increased this century and is far lower than even 50 years ago, I agree. However, compared to just 10-15 years ago, white nationalism has become more acceptable as a public position, due in no small part to a reaction to Obama and the current POTUS.

So, by "rise", do you mean increase in numbers (I agree there has been none) or increase in openness of public positioning (whichI think there has been)?
 
What about the big percentage of whites who didn't own slaves or hate blacks? There were plenty that fought against it making the US a staple in abolishing slavery.

Dont expect the left to acknowledge this. They only want to focus on the negative, and only the negative from white Christian Americans. They conveniently leave out all the positive things that have come from the West, Christians, Americans, white people, Men.

America participated in slavery, but America also defeated it. America has done more good for the world than all the countries combined. Couple that with the fact that more atrocities have been committed on humanity in every other single country.

Yet, here we are discussing just how bad America and white people are.
 
This is a great example of why our nation is going down the *****er. We do our best to prop up the people we like, and we do our best to tear down the people we don't like. To say Trump has done nothing positive is just idiotic. Just like it's idiotic for somebody to say Obama didn't do anything either. The problem is, our media and social media have made it completely okay to hate a side even when they are right.

Back off dude. My economic scorecard has nothing to do with my personal opinion of the guy, and putting words in my mouth and incorrectly using a generalization I said as an example doesn't strengthen the good point you were making.

Trump doesn't deserve praise for pumping deficit spending into an expanding economy. Anyone can do that in a non-deflationary and get a short term GDP bump.
 
Yes, that is true. How does that help you separate out "preserve their culture, national identity/ideology" from "preserve a white power structure"?
I'm just saying there's a lot more to white culture than "white power". There is a lot of dark ****, but there is also a lot that people can be proud of.
 
Would we agree that they are based on religious prejudice, instead?



Who says don't burn wood? If anything, that would be carbon-neutral.



This is what I said:


So, by "rise", do you mean increase in numbers (I agree there has been none) or increase in openness of public positioning (whichI think there has been)?

1. I havent given that any thought. It will suffice to agree wanting to preserve does not always and everywhere equal racism.

2. That's beside the point in that example but people who don't want to breathe the byproducts of incomplete and inefficient combustion.

3. You are saying that and I don't see it. Do you have any evidence of it or is it all anecdotal? I can be convinced pretty easily but for now my anecdotal experience says otherwise.
 
1. I havent given that any thought. It will suffice to agree wanting to preserve does not always and everywhere equal racism.

I absolutely agree there are fears involved that don't come from racism.

2. That's beside the point in that example but people who don't want to breathe the byproducts of incomplete and inefficient combustion.

Well, I thought the point was defending themselves from the diminution of culture, as opposed to being inconsiderate to neighbors. I agree it's a side issue.

3. You are saying that and I don't see it. Do you have any evidence of it or is it all anecdotal? I can be convinced pretty easily but for now my anecdotal experience says otherwise.

The "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville had openly white nationalist participants. The Proud Boys start in/near 2014. Again, I'm not saying these represent increases in the overall rate of white nationalist beliefs, just an increase in their willingness to be open about it.

However, my memory is not that great. If you remember openly racist groups participating in the tea parties, or rallying under Bush 43, perhaps I'm wrong.

Edited: Added an intended "not"
 
Last edited:
The "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville had openly white nationalist participants. The Proud Boys start in/near 2014. Again, I'm saying these represent increases in the overall rate of white nationalist beliefs, just an increase in their willingness to be open about it.

However, my memory is not that great. If you remember openly racist groups participating in the tea parties, or rallying under Bush 43, perhaps I'm wrong.

You may be right but I dont see it as more presence of this tiny fringe than before. We rounded up something like 2,000 of them for conspiracy and other charges after Timothy McVeigh. Maybe that caused a 10-15 year reduction in open marches.


"whitenationalism has become more acceptable as a public position"

This is what I I disagreed with so thank you for clarifying what you meant.
 
Watch it now. Don't lump me in with anything. You simply can't argue the stock market hasn't been amazing. He took an okay market and it's been amazing since his inauguration: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/t...election-is-its-biggest-since-1945-2017-11-08. Obama took a bad market and made it average and Trump took an average market and made it record breaking.

I'll use your source, marketwatch: "The best first two years in office (regardless of term) for a president since Obama from 2013 - 2015"

Why did you cherry pick the first year? Maybe this, from the same source, Trump's second year stocks down 5.2%:

Trump Second year.JPG trump v obama.JPGtrump v obama.JPG
 
I'm neither "pro Trump" nor "pro Obama" nor "pro-presidents determine the stock market"

Facts are facts.
 
Back
Top