What's new

Rate The Jazz Bench

Grade the Bench

  • A+

    Votes: 7 10.0%
  • A

    Votes: 13 18.6%
  • A-

    Votes: 13 18.6%
  • B+

    Votes: 12 17.1%
  • B

    Votes: 13 18.6%
  • B-

    Votes: 7 10.0%
  • C

    Votes: 3 4.3%
  • C-

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • D

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • F

    Votes: 1 1.4%

  • Total voters
    70
I think I had examples of compliment vs complement in my signature for well over a year, back in the day. But then I gave up because some people just wouldn't learn.
I do have a lot of complements for how hard to you work on this.
 
I’m not allowing myself to dream of scenarios where Mike isn’t starting.
This. I wouldn't be surprised if there is some clause in his contact, or at least a gentlemen's agreement that he will always start regardless of the situation.
 
Better than last year... still not amazing IMO. Especially past the top 9 or so... I guess not many teams are deeper than 9-10 useful players anyways, so it shouldn't be a huge problem. This team will go as far as Mitchell and Gobert take it.
 
5-10 are an a minus
11+ are a C minus

if we lose 2 rotation players it will not be pretty
 
Good looking bench with joe and favors. This group looks like our teams strong point we can put them in change the rhythm of the game.
 
Last year, we have one of the worst benches imaginable. This year it should be one of the best. It will be nice to have some depth.
 
Good idea. Last year was so effed up I never closed it out and announced a winner. I’ll do that today.
Also, it would be cool to go back through all the past years and see who the composite top-3 posters are (the best predictors over the span of years). Eh? @colton
 
Back
Top